Opened 4 weeks ago
Last modified 3 weeks ago
#35864 closed Cleanup/optimization
Warn that EmailMessage.connection option is ignored when using send_messages() — at Version 2
Reported by: | Mike Edmunds | Owned by: | Mike Edmunds |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Mail) | Version: | 5.1 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
The EmailMessage connection option is ignored when using send_messages() to send multiple messages as suggested in the docs.
Here's some code that won't in fact use special handling for EU users as the author expects:
from django.core import mail def get_notification_emails(): notification_emails = [] for user in get_users_needing_notification(): email = mail.EmailMultiAlternatives(to=[user.email], ...) # Override the ESP for users in the EU; otherwise the default is fine. if user.profile.must_use_eu_data_processor(): email.connection = mail.get_connection(host="smtp-eu.example.net") notification_emails.append(email) return notification_emails def send_periodic_notification_emails(): messages = get_notification_emails() # We replaced this loop with send_messages() to optimize sending. # https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.1/topics/email/#sending-multiple-emails # for message in messages: # message.send() connection = mail.get_connection() connection.send_messages(messages)
(You probably wouldn't make this mistake writing that code all at the same time, but you might stumble into it if those functions were in different files and the send_messages() optimization got added later.)
If we were designing the EmailMessage API from scratch, a clearer design would probably handle connection
as an EmailMessage.send() parameter, rather than an EmailMessage property. I don't think it's worth the effort to try to change that now. (But there's an opportunity to avoid similar confusion when we introduce provider
as the successor to connection
in #35514.)
Suggested fix: in the EmailMessage.connection docs, note that: "This option is ignored when using send_messages()
." And maybe in the send_messages() section note that it "overrides any connection
option on individual messages."
We could also log a warning in smtp.EmailBackend.send_messages(), if any of the messages has a connection that is not self. (But each EmailBackend implements its own send_messages(), so this wouldn't help with third party backends.)
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 4 weeks ago
Summary: | EmailMessage.connection option ignored when using send_messages() → Warn that EmailMessage.connection option is ignored when using send_messages() |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization |
comment:2 by , 3 weeks ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Owner: | set to |
Status: | new → assigned |
Thank you Mike, the suggestions make sense to me