Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #35747, comment 4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 9, 2024, 10:32:35 AM (2 months ago)
Author:
ldeluigi

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #35747, comment 4

    v1 v2  
    1 Another option would be to honor the default ordering even when `/?o=` is passed. This would mean that changing the url of the sortremove link is not necessary anymore, as it would make that case behave the same as `/?`
     1Another option would be to honor the default ordering even when `/?o=` is passed. This would mean that changing the url of the "sortremove" link is not necessary anymore, as it would make that case behave the same as `/?`
Back to Top