Opened 3 months ago
Closed 3 months ago
#35733 closed Cleanup/optimization (invalid)
Page.__len__ could skip a query if self.paginator.count == 0
Reported by: | Jacob Walls | Owned by: | Jacob Walls |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
With code like this,
paginator = Paginator(unevaluated_queryset, 25) page = paginator.get_page(1) # causes count query via validate_number() if not page: # causes select query return {}
I get an additional query versus:
paginator = Paginator(unevaluated_queryset, 25) if not paginator.count: # causes count query return {}
In the case of no data, the second SELECT query is unnecessary if we already know the paginator is empty. Since paginator.count
is cached, would it be worth optimizing out this additional query? Otherwise, you have to dig into the internals to discover that the two examples above do not perform equivalently.
-
django/core/paginator.py
diff --git a/django/core/paginator.py b/django/core/paginator.py index 7b3189cc8b..334166636d 100644
a b class Page(collections.abc.Sequence): 188 188 return "<Page %s of %s>" % (self.number, self.paginator.num_pages) 189 189 190 190 def __len__(self): 191 if self.paginator.count == 0: 192 return 0 191 193 return len(self.object_list) 192 194 193 195 def __getitem__(self, index):
Change History (4)
comment:2 by , 3 months ago
Or maybe it's not necessary because a page cannot be created without count being cached in the first place?
That's more or less what I found, except that it is possible to manually instantiate a Page
, just unlikely enough that it may not be worth coding around?
The recommend interface is to create the Page
via Paginator.page()
(or Paginator.get_page()
and Paginator.__iter__()
which call it), any of which in turn cache the count via validate_number()
:
You usually won't construct ``Page`` objects by hand -- you'll get them by iterating :class:`Paginator`, or by using :meth:`Paginator.page`.
comment:3 by , 3 months ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
In this case I think it's safe to move forward with the optimization, the closest ticket I could find is #23771.
Note that a similar optimization could have done the other way around though where when a page is requested if len(page.object_list) < paginator.per_page
then count
can be deduced from self.paginator.count = (self.number - 1) * self.paginator.per_page + len(self.object_list)
.
-
django/core/paginator.py
diff --git a/django/core/paginator.py b/django/core/paginator.py index 7b3189cc8b..6b0aafc6d0 100644
a b def page(self, number): 89 89 number = self.validate_number(number) 90 90 bottom = (number - 1) * self.per_page 91 91 top = bottom + self.per_page 92 if top + self.orphans >= self.count:92 if self.orphans and top + self.orphans >= self.count: 93 93 top = self.count 94 94 return self._get_page(self.object_list[bottom:top], number, self) 95 95 … … def __repr__(self): 188 188 return "<Page %s of %s>" % (self.number, self.paginator.num_pages) 189 189 190 190 def __len__(self): 191 return len(self.object_list) 191 if (paginator_count := self.paginator.__dict__.get("count")) == 0: 192 return 0 193 object_list_len = len(self.object_list) 194 if paginator_count is None and object_list_len < self.paginator.per_page: 195 self.paginator.count = ( 196 self.number - 1 197 ) * self.paginator.per_page + object_list_len 198 return object_list_len 192 199 193 200 def __getitem__(self, index): 194 201 if not isinstance(index, (int, slice)):
Unfortunately because Paginator.get_page
validates against self.num_pages
which triggers the calculation of self.count
this is not feasible. On the bright side though, this means that get_page
will systematically trigger self.count
calculation which strengthen the assumption that it's safe to use directly in Page.__len__
.
comment:4 by , 3 months ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
In writing a test case, I discovered that I failed to confirm the no-data case does any additional select query. In the no-data case, a slice of the queryset from [0:0] is taken, which the ORM knows not to perform a query for. So there is nothing to optimize here.
In Paginator.page()
, bottom
and top
are both 0 if the count is 0:
return self._get_page(self.object_list[bottom:top], number, self)
If we are going to do this I think should use
paginator.__dict__.get('count')
instead to avoid causing the inverse problem ifcount
is not already cached? Or maybe it's not necessary because a page cannot be created withoutcount
being cached in the first place?I think that a similar optimization could be used for any
count
that is smaller than the paginator's page size.