Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #35520, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 11, 2024, 12:46:29 PM (5 months ago)
Author:
Simon Charette

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #35520, comment 2

    initial v1  
    119459ec82aa12cad9b859c54c2f33f50bec057f2e was added to resolve #26170 through [https://github.com/django/django/pull/7143 !7143] where the point of data inconsistencies was not brought up. I think it's fair that using `db_for_read` for non-mutable HTTP requests was missed rather than intentional.
     2
     3I suspect we don't want to create a transaction in the first place if we're using `db_for_read`? I worry about admin extensions that might create access records against the write database and might start failing here.
Back to Top