Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #34955, comment 7


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 8, 2023, 9:14:44 AM (13 months ago)
Author:
David Sanders

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #34955, comment 7

    v1 v2  
    77 - Unfortunately we can't change `Concat()` to use `||` because on pg it _does_ evaluate NULLs. If it were to use `||` then we _would_ need to make use of `Coalesce()` to make it consistent.
    88 
    9 I'm kinda hoping though that we do get an immutable concat for pg because concatenating strings seems to be a common desire, at least for me :D
     9I'm kinda hoping though that we do get a (separate) immutable concat for pg because concatenating strings seems to be a common desire, at least for me :D
    1010
    1111Lastly can I just say that (somewhat jokingly but semi-serious)... we may be missing the perfect opportunity to make use of the `__floordiv__()` operator method [3] ;D
Back to Top