Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #34830, comment 15


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 7, 2023, 10:11:19 AM (10 months ago)
Author:
Natalia Bidart

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #34830, comment 15

    initial v1  
    22> As Alex stated in comment 8, I don't think passing the `request` like this causes the template to be rendered with `RequestContext` (which makes the values from context processors available in the template). The ticket summary should at least be retitled to reflect what was actually changed, e.g. "Add request to csrf_failure view context."
    33
    4 Thank you Tim for the comment, indeed your have a valid point. I started drafting a possible solution so a `RequestContext` is used, I ended up with this diff:
     4Thank you Tim for the comment, indeed your have a valid point. I started drafting a possible solution so a `RequestContext` is used, I ended up with this diff. It still needs tests and some validation that this is an acceptable solution:
    55{{{
    66#!diff
Back to Top