#34368 closed Bug (fixed)
Subquery referencing WINDOW expression breaks query compilation
Reported by: | Jannis Vajen | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | 4.2 |
Severity: | Release blocker | Keywords: | window orm filter subquery |
Cc: | Simon Charette | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
#28333 introduced the ability to filter on WINDOW expressions but when a WINDOW expression is referred to in a subquery, the query compiler fails: ValueError: Need either using or connection
I assume it has to do with self.connection
not being passed on to inner_query.get_compiler
in get_qualify_sql
introduced here: https://github.com/django/django/commit/f387d024fc75569d2a4a338bfda76cc2f328f627#diff-f58de2deaccecd2d53199c5ca29e3e1050ec2adb80fb057cdfc0b4e6accdf14fR624
Below is the full traceback. A dummy test is available here: https://github.com/jnns/django/commit/04d59e27503fb376d60314806876ecbae89d9b62
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/unittest/case.py", line 57, in testPartExecutor yield File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/unittest/case.py", line 623, in run self._callTestMethod(testMethod) File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/unittest/case.py", line 579, in _callTestMethod if method() is not None: File "tests/expressions_window/tests.py", line 1025, in test_filter_subquery list( File "django/db/models/query.py", line 398, in __iter__ self._fetch_all() File "django/db/models/query.py", line 1881, in _fetch_all self._result_cache = list(self._iterable_class(self)) File "django/db/models/query.py", line 91, in __iter__ results = compiler.execute_sql( File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 1545, in execute_sql sql, params = self.as_sql() File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 732, in as_sql extra_select, order_by, group_by = self.pre_sql_setup( File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 84, in pre_sql_setup self.setup_query(with_col_aliases=with_col_aliases) File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 73, in setup_query self.select, self.klass_info, self.annotation_col_map = self.get_select( File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 296, in get_select sql, params = self.compile(col) File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 542, in compile sql, params = node.as_sql(self, self.connection) File "django/db/models/expressions.py", line 1536, in as_sql subquery_sql, sql_params = self.query.as_sql(compiler, connection) File "django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1150, in as_sql sql, params = self.get_compiler(connection=connection).as_sql() File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 751, in as_sql result, params = self.get_qualify_sql() File "django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 676, in get_qualify_sql inner_query_compiler = inner_query.get_compiler( File "django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 298, in get_compiler raise ValueError("Need either using or connection") ValueError: Need either using or connection
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 21 months ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:2 by , 21 months ago
I started work on https://github.com/django/django/pull/16597 but now I'm in need of assistance. The query compiles fine if connection
is added, but I am unsure about the correctness of the resulting query.
I added the test WindowFunctionTests.test_filter_subquery
to describe the behaviour I expected to see. Maybe this is out of scope for the referenced feature #15922 or completely intentional. I am not sure.
This is the query in the failing test is currently generated:
SELECT "expressions_window_employee"."name", (SELECT "col1" FROM (SELECT * FROM (SELECT U0."code" AS "col1", RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY "expressions_window_employee"."department" ORDER BY "expressions_window_employee"."salary" DESC) AS "qual0" FROM "expressions_window_classification" U0) "qualify" WHERE "col1" = ("qual0") ) "qualify_mask" LIMIT 1) AS "code" FROM "expressions_window_employee"
Whereas this is what I would expect:
SELECT name, (SELECT "code" FROM "expressions_window_classification" WHERE "code" = "department_salary_rank" LIMIT 1) AS code FROM ( SELECT "expressions_window_employee"."name", RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY "expressions_window_employee"."department" ORDER BY "expressions_window_employee"."salary" DESC) AS "department_salary_rank" FROM "expressions_window_employee" )
comment:3 by , 21 months ago
Passing connection
will address the crash but there seems to be a more fundamental issue when using OuterRef
to refer to a window expression
SELECT "expressions_window_employee"."id", "expressions_window_employee"."name", "expressions_window_employee"."salary", "expressions_window_employee"."department", "expressions_window_employee"."hire_date", "expressions_window_employee"."age", "expressions_window_employee"."classification_id", "expressions_window_employee"."bonus", RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY "expressions_window_employee"."department" ORDER BY "expressions_window_employee"."salary" DESC) AS "department_salary_rank", (SELECT "col1" FROM (SELECT * FROM (SELECT U0."name" AS "col1", RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY "expressions_window_employee"."department" ORDER BY "expressions_window_employee"."salary" DESC) AS "qual0", U0."age" AS "qual1" FROM "expressions_window_employee" U0) "qualify" WHERE "qual1" = ("qual0") ) "qualify_mask" LIMIT 1) AS "foo" FROM "expressions_window_employee";
The RANK()
window within the subquery will be against the subquery table and not the outer one which only happens to work in this case because it happens to be the same table.
I believe the proper SQL here would be
SELECT *, (SELECT U0."name" FROM "expressions_window_employee" U0 WHERE U0."age" = "department_salary_rank" LIMIT 1) AS "foo" FROM ( SELECT "expressions_window_employee"."id", "expressions_window_employee"."name", "expressions_window_employee"."salary", "expressions_window_employee"."department", "expressions_window_employee"."hire_date", "expressions_window_employee"."age", "expressions_window_employee"."classification_id", "expressions_window_employee"."bonus", RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY "expressions_window_employee"."department" ORDER BY "expressions_window_employee"."salary" DESC) AS "department_salary_rank" FROM "expressions_window_employee" ) subquery
Things get even more complex when filtering against a subquery annotation that refers to a window function as that filter not requires QUALIFY
emulation. Things get even more complex when using nested subqueries referring to an outerquery window function.
I would strongly suggest we opt for explicitly not supporting subqueries references to outerref window function instead of trying to get 4.2 working with them and create a new feature request to add support for them as they require special care to get working properly.
-
django/db/models/expressions.py
diff --git a/django/db/models/expressions.py b/django/db/models/expressions.py index 2d8a5c5919..a426195b0d 100644
a b def as_sql(self, *args, **kwargs): 857 857 858 858 def resolve_expression(self, *args, **kwargs): 859 859 col = super().resolve_expression(*args, **kwargs) 860 if col.contains_over_clause: 861 raise NotSupportedError( 862 f"Referencing outer query window expression is not supported: {self.name}" 863 ) 860 864 # FIXME: Rename possibly_multivalued to multivalued and fix detection 861 865 # for non-multivalued JOINs (e.g. foreign key fields). This should take 862 866 # into account only many-to-many and one-to-many relationships. -
django/db/models/sql/compiler.py
diff --git a/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py b/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py index 6929f216b4..21234fb6b0 100644
a b def collect_replacements(expressions): 674 674 ) 675 675 ) 676 676 inner_query_compiler = inner_query.get_compiler( 677 self.using, elide_empty=self.elide_empty677 self.using, connection=self.connection, elide_empty=self.elide_empty 678 678 ) 679 679 inner_sql, inner_params = inner_query_compiler.as_sql( 680 680 # The limits must be applied to the outer query to avoid pruning -
tests/expressions_window/tests.py
diff --git a/tests/expressions_window/tests.py b/tests/expressions_window/tests.py index 027fc9c25c..a27c4f222f 100644
a b def test_invalid_filter(self): 1578 1578 list(qs.exclude(window=1, department="Accounting")) 1579 1579 1580 1580 1581 class WindowUnsupportedTests( TestCase):1581 class WindowUnsupportedTests(SimpleTestCase): 1582 1582 def test_unsupported_backend(self): 1583 1583 msg = "This backend does not support window expressions." 1584 1584 with mock.patch.object(connection.features, "supports_over_clause", False): … … def test_unsupported_backend(self): 1587 1587 dense_rank=Window(expression=DenseRank()) 1588 1588 ).get() 1589 1589 1590 def test_filter_subquery(self): 1591 qs = Employee.objects.annotate( 1592 department_salary_rank=Window( 1593 Rank(), partition_by="department", order_by="-salary" 1594 ) 1595 ) 1596 msg = "Referencing outer query window expression is not supported: department_salary_rank" 1597 with self.assertRaisesMessage(NotSupportedError, msg): 1598 qs.annotate( 1599 employee_name=Subquery( 1600 Employee.objects.filter( 1601 age=OuterRef("department_salary_rank") 1602 ).values("name")[:1] 1603 ) 1604 ) 1605 1590 1606 1591 1607 class NonQueryWindowTests(SimpleTestCase): 1592 1608 def test_window_repr(self):
comment:5 by , 21 months ago
Dear Mariusz, dear Simon,
I updated the old pull request I opened before with a new commit containing Simon's suggestions. Please have a look.
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 21 months ago
Thanks Jannis! To make it clear, I think we should definitely have a ticket to add outer reference to window support but it seems impossible to do so before the 4.2 release.
comment:7 by , 21 months ago
Replying to Simon Charette:
Thanks Jannis! To make it clear, I think we should definitely have a ticket to add outer reference to window support but it seems impossible to do so before the 4.2 release.
A new ticket is probably not required as #28333 is still open.
comment:8 by , 21 months ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
Thanks again for the report! Would you like to prepare a patch?