Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #34251, comment 1
- Timestamp:
- Jan 11, 2023, 5:08:03 AM (23 months ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #34251, comment 1
initial v1 9 9 Maybe this is a good idea. I don't know — what would it look like? (It's really hard to say without a concrete suggestion in hand.) I think the way forward would be to show what the edit to the paginator would look like — is it just going to warn or do you think automatically enforcing the correct ordering is wanted? With that in hand it's easier to say if it's going be too complex or not to be worth the effort. 10 10 11 The flip side of complexity is how useful this might be. That it was fixed for the admin is positive, see #17198 — ''...we can't expect users to understand partial ordering...'' . I still think a proof-of-concept would be helpful, but a discussion on the DevelopersMailingList or the Django Forum would reach a bigger audience, to get more voices.11 The flip side of complexity is how useful this might be. That it was fixed for the admin is positive, see #17198 — ''...we can't expect users to understand partial ordering...'' — but other tickets have been closed as wontfix/invalid, #28657 #28261. I still think a proof-of-concept would be helpful, but a discussion on the DevelopersMailingList or the Django Forum would reach a bigger audience, to get more voices. 12 12 13 13 Make sense?