#32692 closed Bug (invalid)
Django 3.2 automatic AppConfig discovery breaks projects working in 3.1.8
Reported by: | Manel Clos | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.admin | Version: | 3.2 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
The described method of overriding the default admin site (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/contrib/admin/#overriding-the-default-admin-site), is not compatible with automatic AppConfig discovery, if the app (myproject, or myapps) is already in INSTALLED_APPS.
Example:
pip install Django==3.2
django-admin startproject myproject
python manage.py migrate
python manage.py createsuperuser
- Put a template in
myproject/templates/admin/base_site.html
{% extends 'admin/base_site.html' %} {% block branding %} Template test {% endblock %}
- Add
myproject
toINSTALLED_APPS
INSTALLED_APPS = [ 'myproject', 'django.contrib.admin', 'django.contrib.auth', 'django.contrib.contenttypes', 'django.contrib.sessions', 'django.contrib.messages', 'django.contrib.staticfiles', ]
python manage.py runserver
works, I can access the admin site and see the changes in templates- Follow the guide to override the default admin site, https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/contrib/admin/#overriding-the-default-admin-site, this is, create
myproject/admin.py
,myproject/apps.py
and modifysettings.py
.# myproject/admin.py from django.contrib import admin class MyAdminSite(admin.AdminSite): index_title = 'Test' # myproject/apps.py from django.contrib.admin.apps import AdminConfig class MyAdminConfig(AdminConfig): default_site = 'myproject.admin.MyAdminSite' # myproject/settings.py INSTALLED_APPS = [ 'myproject', 'myproject.apps.MyAdminConfig', # 'django.contrib.admin', 'django.contrib.auth', 'django.contrib.contenttypes', 'django.contrib.sessions', 'django.contrib.messages', 'django.contrib.staticfiles', ]
python manage.py runserver
Actual result:
RuntimeError: 'myproject.apps' declares more than one default AppConfig: 'AdminConfig', 'MyAdminConfig'.
`
Is this a regression?
pip install Django==3.1.8
python manage.py runserver
- All ok, both templates and AdminConfig working at the same time
Workaroud
- use
app_admin.py
instead ofapps.py
when following the documentation to override the default admin site# myproject/apps_admin.py from django.contrib.admin.apps import AdminConfig class MyAdminConfig(AdminConfig): default_site = 'myproject.admin.MyAdminSite'
- adjust settings.py: `'myproject.apps_admin.MyAdminConfig' in INSTALLED_APPS
INSTALLED_APPS = [ 'myproject', 'myproject.apps_admin.MyAdminConfig', # 'django.contrib.admin', 'django.contrib.auth', 'django.contrib.contenttypes', 'django.contrib.sessions', 'django.contrib.messages', 'django.contrib.staticfiles', ]
- works with Django 3.2!
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Component: | Core (Other) → contrib.admin |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
Resolution: | → duplicate |
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 4 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | duplicate |
Status: | closed → new |
Hi, I reviewed #30402 and it is not the same bug. Also, the steps to reproduce show that the admin site is customised inside the main project as you suggest. Reopening.
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
Description updated with the example code that was overwritten in comment 2
comment:5 by , 4 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
You shouldn't have myproject
in the INSTALLED_APPS
it's not an app. Please use one of support channels if you have further questions.
follow-up: 8 comment:6 by , 4 years ago
Ok, but take into account that this has worked on every Django version til 3.2, and there is no indication about what's wrong or deprecated, it just stops working because of the automatic AppConfig discovery. Now I've to create a different app just to put some *global* templates, sigh...
comment:7 by , 4 years ago
Hi Marius, just checked the documentation: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/applications/#projects-and-applications
The project package is often extended to include things like fixtures, CSS, and templates which aren’t tied to a particular application.
There’s no restriction that a project package can’t also be considered an application and have models, etc. (which would require adding it to INSTALLED_APPS).
I really think Django 3.2 is breaking this, but I can open a different ticket to fix the documentation if you prefer that.
comment:8 by , 4 years ago
Replying to Manel Clos:
Ok, but take into account that this has worked on every Django version til 3.2, and there is no indication about what's wrong or deprecated, it just stops working because of the automatic AppConfig discovery. Now I've to create a different app just to put some *global* templates, sigh...
Yes but it was only by chance, that kind of configuration wasn't officially supported.
Now I've to create a different app just to put some *global* templates, sigh...
You don't need to have an app for global templates.
comment:9 by , 4 years ago
Specifically Manel you can use the DIR
option to the TEMPLATES
setting to configure project level directories, rather than (mis)using APP_DIRS
, which loads the per-app templates, that you've been relying on up to now.
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/settings/#std:setting-TEMPLATES-DIRS
See also the Overriding Templates How-To, which provides more of a walk through of the configuration at the beginning. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/howto/overriding-templates/
comment:10 by , 4 years ago
Hi Carlton, I agree, but I'd also need to modify STATICFILES_DIRS, and FIXTURES_DIRS, and maybe something else.
In the end it would be better to modify the AdminConfig documentation as Marius suggested, even when this was previously working correctly up to 3.2.
Based on the tested workaround in the description, what about this? https://github.com/manelclos/django/commit/c5da1ff59d6d53dc25cf503be9d59c1f825fb10a
comment:11 by , 4 years ago
Based on the tested workaround in the description, what about this? https://github.com/manelclos/django/commit/c5da1ff59d6d53dc25cf503be9d59c1f825fb10a
This change is not correct, you can still use apps.py
unless you do this in the main project and you don't use your project as an app, because it will discover two configs. I think proposed change makes it even more confusing.
comment:12 by , 4 years ago
Ok, would you consider a patch to https://github.com/django/django/commit/e0519301238b43633bab64054772f9a62634a05f, basically removing the last paragraph?
There's no restriction that a project package can't also be considered an application and have models, etc. (which would require adding it to :setting:
INSTALLED_APPS
).
Otherwise I'd consider this settled :)
IMO it's a duplicate of #30402. You should customize a default admin site inside a main project directory (like described in the documentation) not in an app.
Please feel-free to send a PR with docs adjustments if you think we should make it clearer.