Admin's raw_id_field check admin.E002 doesn't catch .attname mis-references

[Simon Charette]

Since admin.E002 relies on models.Options.get_field which allows retrieval of fields by both name and attname referring to fields by attname while only name ​is taken into consideration allows the check to pass while raw_id_fields is not honoured.

e.g.

class BookAdmin(ModelAdmin):
    raw_id_fields = ['author_id']

passes admin.E002 but the author field won't use the raw_id feature.

The _check_raw_id_fields_item method should also make sure to check field.name == field_name on field retrieval success and return refer_to_missing_field(field=field_name, option=label, obj=obj, id='admin.E002') when it's not the case.

[Simon Charette]

Alternatively all db_field.name in self.raw_id_fields checks could be changed to db_field.name in self.raw_id_fields or db_field.attname in self.raw_id_fields but that seems like a lot of work for little benefit.

[Jacob Walls]

​PR

[Hasan Ramezani]

I've created a ​PR to check field.name with field_name in _check_raw_id_fields_item method.

Alternatively all db_field.name in self.raw_id_fields checks could be changed to db_field.name in self.raw_id_fields or db_field.attname in self.raw_id_fields but that seems like a lot of work for little benefit.

I found two lines in the django.contrib.admin.options which have db_field.name in self.raw_id_fields check:

• ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/d3ecef26b9fda02b88f925a800ae38dd5873c878/django/contrib/admin/options.py#L229
• ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/d3ecef26b9fda02b88f925a800ae38dd5873c878/django/contrib/admin/options.py#L262

Should I change them?

[Simon Charette]

Hasan, I think it's one way or the other.

We either add tested support for referring to fields by .attname by changing all db_field.name in raw_id_fields checks to {db_field.name, db_field.attname}.union(raw_id_fields) or adjust admin.E002 not to return false negative when dealing with .attname references.

Either way works and I don't have strong feeling about one approach over the other as its not silently allowed to be misconfigured.

[Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@…>]

In 20ddc3b:

Fixed #32494 -- Adjusted system check for raw_id_fields to warn about Field.attname.