Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #32494, comment 6
- Timestamp:
- Mar 2, 2021, 10:15:23 AM (4 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #32494, comment 6
initial v1 3 3 We either add tested support for referring to fields by `.attname` by changing all `db_field.name in raw_id_fields` checks to `{db_field.name, db_field.attname}.union(raw_id_fields)` **or** adjust `admin.E002` not to return false negative when dealing with `.attname` references. 4 4 5 Either way works and I don't have strong feeling about one approach over the other as its not silently allowed to be misconfigured.5 Either way works and I don't have strong feeling about one approach over the other as long as its not silently allowed to be misconfigured.