#31926 closed Bug (fixed)
Queryset crashes when recreated from a pickled query with FilteredRelation used in aggregation.
Reported by: | Beda Kosata | Owned by: | David Wobrock |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | 2.2 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | David Wobrock | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I am pickling query objects (queryset.query) for later re-evaluation as per https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/models/querysets/#pickling-querysets. However, when I tried to rerun a query that contains a FilteredRelation
inside a filter, I get an psycopg2.errors.UndefinedTable: missing FROM-clause entry for table "t3"
error.
I created a minimum reproducible example.
models.py
from django.db import models class Publication(models.Model): title = models.CharField(max_length=64) class Session(models.Model): TYPE_CHOICES = (('A', 'A'), ('B', 'B')) publication = models.ForeignKey(Publication, on_delete=models.CASCADE) session_type = models.CharField(choices=TYPE_CHOICES, default='A', max_length=1) place = models.CharField(max_length=16) value = models.PositiveIntegerField(default=1)
The actual code to cause the crash:
import pickle from django.db.models import FilteredRelation, Q, Sum from django_error.models import Publication, Session p1 = Publication.objects.create(title='Foo') p2 = Publication.objects.create(title='Bar') Session.objects.create(publication=p1, session_type='A', place='X', value=1) Session.objects.create(publication=p1, session_type='B', place='X', value=2) Session.objects.create(publication=p2, session_type='A', place='X', value=4) Session.objects.create(publication=p2, session_type='B', place='X', value=8) Session.objects.create(publication=p1, session_type='A', place='Y', value=1) Session.objects.create(publication=p1, session_type='B', place='Y', value=2) Session.objects.create(publication=p2, session_type='A', place='Y', value=4) Session.objects.create(publication=p2, session_type='B', place='Y', value=8) qs = Publication.objects.all().annotate( relevant_sessions=FilteredRelation('session', condition=Q(session__session_type='A')) ).annotate(x=Sum('relevant_sessions__value')) # just print it out to make sure the query works print(list(qs)) qs2 = Publication.objects.all() qs2.query = pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(qs.query)) # the following crashes with an error # psycopg2.errors.UndefinedTable: missing FROM-clause entry for table "t3" # LINE 1: ...n"."id" = relevant_sessions."publication_id" AND (T3."sessio... print(list(qs2))
In the crashing query, there seems to be a difference in the table_map
attribute - this is probably where the t3
table is coming from.
Please let me know if there is any more info required for hunting this down.
Cheers
Beda
p.s.- I also tried in Django 3.1 and the behavior is the same.
p.p.s.- just to make sure, I am not interested in ideas on how to rewrite the query - the above is a very simplified version of what I use, so it would probably not be applicable anyway.
Attachments (1)
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Summary: | missing FROM-clause entry when unpickling queries with FilteredRelation → Queryset crashes when recreated from a pickled query with FilteredRelation used in aggregation. |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Just a note, the failing queryset does not have to be constructed using the
qs2 = Publication.objects.all() qs2.query = pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(qs.query))
The same problem occurs even if the whole queryset is pickled and unpickled and then a copy is created by calling .all()
.
qs2 = pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(qs)).all()
comment:3 by , 4 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Has patch: | set |
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
Hi,
I started from the test Mariusz wrote, and followed the code down to where it diverged, comparing the pickling case to the expected QuerySet.
Details can be found in the PR: https://github.com/django/django/pull/13484
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
Left some comments on the PR regarding the __hash__
implementations but it looks like David identified the underlying issue appropriately.
comment:5 by , 4 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
Integrated the suggested changes, thanks!
I'm wondering if the patch should be backported to 2.2 and 3.0 - I guess I'll let you consider and handle this.
Thanks for this ticket, I was able to reproduce this issue.