Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #31711, comment 2
- Timestamp:
- Jun 15, 2020, 2:34:13 AM (4 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #31711, comment 2
initial v1 1 Well, then the docum antation is wrong too!1 Well, then the documentation is also wrong! 2 2 3 If I want to access the archive of the first week of a year, I call the link /year/1 and I expect to receive the data for this year and week numer one. But what I get is this year and week+13 If I want to access the archive of the first week of a year, I call the link /year/1 and expect the data for this year and week number one. But what I get is this year and week number 2 4 4 5 Or the other way, the user calls the webpage /2020/24, but gets a page for 2020/25. The page displays the data for week 25 and it has the title of week 25, Is this te expected result of a SEO freindly link? 5 Or the other way round, the user calls the web page /2020/24, but gets a page for 2020/25, which shows the data of the 25th week and has the title of the 25th week: Is this the expected result of an SEO friendly link? 6 7 Computers are supposed to work for users, not users work for computers. 8 If you enter 2002/januar, you expect the data for January and not for February. Right? 9 10 Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)