Opened 6 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#30500 closed Bug (fixed)
Error reporting returns a circular import error on a python formatting error, and does not restart the development server
Reported by: | Runner15 | Owned by: | Tom Forbes |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Error reporting | Version: | 2.2 |
Severity: | Release blocker | Keywords: | error reporting, error, circular import |
Cc: | Keryn Knight, Tom Forbes | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
In Django 2.2.1, a python formatting error, such as a NameError or IndentationError will give the error shown below:
Exception in thread django-main-thread: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/resolvers.py", line 581, in url_patterns iter(patterns) TypeError: 'module' object is not iterable During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.5/threading.py", line 914, in _bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/lib/python3.5/threading.py", line 862, in run self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/utils/autoreload.py", line 54, in wrapper fn(*args, **kwargs) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/runserver.py", line 117, in inner_run self.check(display_num_errors=True) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 390, in check include_deployment_checks=include_deployment_checks, File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 377, in _run_checks return checks.run_checks(**kwargs) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/checks/registry.py", line 72, in run_checks new_errors = check(app_configs=app_configs) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/checks/urls.py", line 13, in check_url_config return check_resolver(resolver) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/checks/urls.py", line 23, in check_resolver return check_method() File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/resolvers.py", line 398, in check for pattern in self.url_patterns: File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py", line 80, in __get__ res = instance.__dict__[self.name] = self.func(instance) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/resolvers.py", line 588, in url_patterns raise ImproperlyConfigured(msg.format(name=self.urlconf_name)) django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: The included URLconf 'runnertest.urls' does not appear to have any patterns in it. If you see valid patterns in the file then the issue is probably caused by a circular import.
This throws django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured error, with the message that the main urls file does not appear to have any patters in it, and if there are patterns then the issue is probably a circular import.
Neither of these are the problem, as it is just a simple line in the code that is indented improperly, or a variable that is not assigned. When this issue is fixed, the development server does not restart itself to reflect this fix. It manually has to be quit and then restarted.
The code below is the same python formatting error in Django 2.1. It shows the error at the end of the error reporting, and when the error is fixed in the code, the development server restarts itself.
Unhandled exception in thread started by <function check_errors.<locals>.wrapper at 0x7f03cb1029d8> Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/utils/autoreload.py", line 225, in wrapper fn(*args, **kwargs) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/runserver.py", line 117, in inner_run self.check(display_num_errors=True) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 379, in check include_deployment_checks=include_deployment_checks, File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 366, in _run_checks return checks.run_checks(**kwargs) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/checks/registry.py", line 71, in run_checks new_errors = check(app_configs=app_configs) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/checks/urls.py", line 40, in check_url_namespaces_unique all_namespaces = _load_all_namespaces(resolver) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/checks/urls.py", line 57, in _load_all_namespaces url_patterns = getattr(resolver, 'url_patterns', []) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py", line 37, in __get__ res = instance.__dict__[self.name] = self.func(instance) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/resolvers.py", line 533, in url_patterns patterns = getattr(self.urlconf_module, "urlpatterns", self.urlconf_module) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py", line 37, in __get__ res = instance.__dict__[self.name] = self.func(instance) File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/resolvers.py", line 526, in urlconf_module return import_module(self.urlconf_name) File "/usr/lib/python3.5/importlib/__init__.py", line 126, in import_module return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 986, in _gcd_import File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 969, in _find_and_load File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 958, in _find_and_load_unlocked File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 673, in _load_unlocked File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 665, in exec_module File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 222, in _call_with_frames_removed File "/mnt/c/Users/myName/documents/python/django/runnertest/runnertest/urls.py", line 23, in <module> path('air/', include('appName.urls')), File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/conf.py", line 34, in include urlconf_module = import_module(urlconf_module) File "/usr/lib/python3.5/importlib/__init__.py", line 126, in import_module return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 986, in _gcd_import File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 969, in _find_and_load File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 958, in _find_and_load_unlocked File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 673, in _load_unlocked File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 665, in exec_module File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 222, in _call_with_frames_removed File "/mnt/c/Users/myName/documents/python/django/runnertest/appName/urls.py", line 3, in <module> from . import views File "/mnt/c/Users/myName/documents/python/django/runnertest/appName/views.py", line 233, in <module> a NameError: name 'a' is not defined
This can be replicated by adding an extra space on a line in your views file, or throwing a variable name that does not exist on its own line.
Change History (22)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
Type: | Uncategorized → Bug |
---|
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → needsinfo |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Type: | Bug → Cleanup/optimization |
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 6 years ago
It looks like a duplicate of #30323. I'm able to reproduce this in Django 2.2 but in 2.2.1 everything works as expected. See release notes:
Fixed a regression in Django 2.2 that caused a crash of runserver when URLConf modules raised exceptions (#30323).
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
I have it reproduced in Django 2.2.1, as that is where the error message posted in the original ticket was from. It does not give the error location nor does it restart the development server.
Replying to felixxm:
It looks like a duplicate of #30323. I'm able to reproduce this in Django 2.2 but in 2.2.1 everything works as expected. See release notes:
Fixed a regression in Django 2.2 that caused a crash of runserver when URLConf modules raised exceptions (#30323).
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | needsinfo |
---|---|
Status: | closed → new |
Re-opening as I can reproduce the less-useful-exception in 2.2.1 vs 2.2 (via Python 3.6)
The correct error which should be surfaced is (2.1):
NameError: name 'a' is not defined
The error which is surfaced currently (2.2.1) is:
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: The included URLconf 't30500.urls' does not appear to have any patterns in it. If you see valid patterns in the file then the issue is probably caused by a circular import.
Example reproducible project is available: https://github.com/kezabelle/django-bug-30500
Steps to reproduce:
- runserver the project under 2.1
- Uncomment the "a" in "t30500/views.py" to trigger the reloader and the exception to stdout
Do the same under 2.2, and the error won't turn up.
comment:6 by , 6 years ago
I still cannot reproduce this issue on Django 2.2.1 even with your tests project, I get correct exception (the same like with Django 2.1.)
File "/tmp/django-bug-30500/t30500/urls2.py", line 1, in <module> from . import views File "/tmp/django-bug-30500/t30500/views.py", line 5, in <module> a NameError: name 'a' is not defined
Are you using StatReloader or Watchman?
comment:7 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
OK, this reproduces for me using Python 3.6.0.
However, we only support the latest point release of each Python series, so currently 3.6.8. It works there.
Mariusz reports he tested against 3.6.3, where it also works.
Thus this is an issue in Python that was resolved some time before 3.6.3. (I'm pretty sure this always used to require a restart, so likely it changed around then.)
Thanks for the report and project to follow-up! I suggest updating Python to 3.6.8 (or 3.7 if you can.)
comment:8 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
Verified the correct error message (NameError: name 'a' is not defined
) turns up under Python 3.5.7, so I guess it is a non-issue overall (fwiw, I was verifying under 3.6.2, if Mariusz couldn't reproduce under 3.6.3, it got "fixed" upstream in that version).
(I would argue that the ergonomics of Django are harmed by not fixing this because it works in the officially-supported point releases, because it is more likely to mask problems affecting new users, who are learning Django but don't necessarily know the ecosystem well enough to install/maintain their own version (eg: by using system python, or whatever))
comment:9 by , 5 years ago
Actually with a bit of effort, I can still reproduce it under 3.5.7 at least, and I'm suspicious about it being a race condition/timing(/threading?) problem:
Given:
import time, os, random >>> while True: ... time.sleep(random.random()) ... os.utime('/path/to/t30500/t30500/views.py')
after some arbitrary period of leaving python -b -B manage.py runserver 0:8080
running, I can get it to do it:
[...] File "/path/to/t30500/t30500/urls2.py", line 1, in <module> from . import views File "/path/to/t30500/t30500/views.py", line 3, in <module> a NameError: name 'a' is not defined /path/to/t30500/t30500/views.py changed, reloading. Watching for file changes with StatReloader Performing system checks... Exception in thread django-main-thread: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/path/to/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/resolvers.py", line 581, in url_patterns iter(patterns) TypeError: 'module' object is not iterable During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: [...] File "/path/to/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/core/checks/urls.py", line 57, in _load_all_namespaces url_patterns = getattr(resolver, 'url_patterns', []) File "/path/to/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py", line 80, in __get__ res = instance.__dict__[self.name] = self.func(instance) File "/path/to/lib/python3.5/site-packages/django/urls/resolvers.py", line 588, in url_patterns raise ImproperlyConfigured(msg.format(name=self.urlconf_name)) django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: The included URLconf 't30500.urls' does not appear to have any patterns in it. If you see valid patterns in the file then the issue is probably caused by a circular import.
If it is some form of timing problem, it could be that it has always existed, but the move to Pathlib has made this specific occurrence more visible because it's slower, and possibly it's visibility changes between python versions (I can't say I've tracked if it's been optimised in 3.6+) for that reason too.
I don't know. None of it is particularly clear cut; these kinds of things never are.
comment:10 by , 5 years ago
I would argue that the ergonomics of Django are harmed...
I totally agree with this sentiment. I'd be happy to reopen if we can pin down an actionable step. (Bearing in mind Django 3.0 is Python 3.6+ only.)
I'm initially doubtful that a workaround for an obtuse Python bug is going to be worth our effort... — as you say, who knows?
(I'm pretty sure I used to have to restart the dev server quite frequently back in the day... — not that that's an argument for anything I suppose.)
comment:11 by , 5 years ago
Yeah, if I had any real idea about how to move it forwards, I fully appreciate that would help :)
My main concern is twofold:
- New users are potentially (though not necessarily) more likely to experience a problem if it is a version specific issue, as they may not have the skills or opportunity to be on the latest and greatest Python version; or if they do encounter it (regardless of version) it is masking an actual error.
- that 2.2 is an LTS, and 3.5 is still one of the supported versions for that, so even if there's a perceived ergonomics regression in something as vital as autoreloading (being that wsgi is long-lived but not statically typed), the opportunity to fix it before it's essentially is frozen is arguably perhaps up to December, after which it'd almost certainly be a sub-par experience for those sticking with it (and the fewer users therein who encounter the problem) for the remainder of it's lifetime (until the next LTS in 2022)
Once upon a time, at least SyntaxError caused a restart to be required IIRC, but I think that's not been the case for a while now (I'd check further, but I can't recall when it might've been). I can't recall if NameError or UnboundLocalError previously caused similar manual restarts, but I wouldn't be entirely surprised.
comment:12 by , 5 years ago
Adding details as I figure them out a bit, on the off-chance they prove valuable:
instrumented django/urls/resolvers.py
:
def url_patterns(...): patterns = getattr(self.urlconf_module, "urlpatterns", self.urlconf_module) print('url_patterns', type(patterns), patterns)
instrumented django/utils/autoreload.py
:
def run(...): [...] try: v = get_resolver().urlconf_module print('run', type(v), v) [...]
Then, running the utime(...)
script in a while loop as above, with runserver running (and a
commented out):
url_patterns <class 'list'> [<URLResolver <module 't30500.urls2' from '/path/to/t30500/t30500/urls2.py'> (None:None) ''>] run <class 'module'> <module 't30500.urls' from '/path/to/t30500/t30500/urls.py'> url_patterns <class 'list'> [<URLPattern ''>]
The order of those calls changes sometimes (for me), so I guess it's maybe separate threads and non-deterministic? But importantly, they stay the same types and values, by the look of it.
If a
is uncommented, to raise NameError: name 'a' is not defined
, every time NameError
is thrown, the only print is:
run <class 'module'> <module 't30500.urls' from '/path/to/t30500/t30500/urls.py'> Exception in thread django-main-thread: [...]
when ImproperlyConfigured: The included URLconf 't30500.urls' ...
is thrown, the only print is instead, this:
url_patterns <class 'module'> <module 't30500.urls' from '/path/to/t30500/t30500/urls.py'> Exception in thread django-main-thread: [...]
This seems like an important distinction (to me, with my highly sophisticated print-debugging, as pdb was being little help), and additionally the patterns variable is a module, rather than a list.
comment:13 by , 5 years ago
Just to follow up from the request on our duplicate ticket #30674, the version of Python we were running is Python 3.5.2 (default, Nov 12 2018, 13:43:14) [GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux. We can't update to the latest 3.5.7 as it's not available in the OS repository (APT / Yum) and we are not allowed to install from source.
comment:14 by , 5 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Resolution: | invalid |
Status: | closed → new |
Version: | 2.2 → master |
I've spent some time digging into this, and it is indeed a race condition of some kind. I think it comes down to this CPython issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue36284 (importlib.import_module() not thread safe if Exception is raised (3.4, 3.5)). I've re-opened the ticket and marked it against master, because it's not clear when or even if this is fixed in Python core.
Basically, as far as I can tell, the code inside the autoreloader that prevents one race condition causes another. Here it's racing the 'run_checks' method called from runserver's 'inner_run', which both load the urlconf_module via the 'urlconf_module' cached property. In the case of an error being thrown _and a race happening_, then the module returned is not initialized correctly and has no 'urlpatterns' attribute. This causes the "patterns = getattr(self.urlconf_module, "urlpatterns", self.urlconf_module)" statement to fall back to the default, which is the module object itself. This then fails the iteration.
The obvious thing to do here is to add a lock around 'urlconf_module', or in the ticket linked above you can call importlib.reload()
on the result. I'd have a preference for the lock approach on all Python versions, and after adding one I've not seen any failures after running the reproduction script for half an hour.
comment:15 by , 5 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Owner: | set to |
Status: | new → assigned |
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:16 by , 5 years ago
Is it really worth adding this to master, if the bug cannot be reproduced with Python 3.6+?
comment:17 by , 5 years ago
It was apparently fixed in 3.6.3 via this ticket: https://bugs.python.org/issue31070 - "Fix a race condition in importlib _get_module_lock()." and in this MR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3033/files
I'd like to fix it in master for a couple of reasons:
- It adds no overhead at all and ensures this won't happen if there is a regression in upstream Python. What if future importlib changes cause this, or something similar to flair up again? - Note that the bug was only _noticed_ due to some test changes, this doesn't give me a lot of hope.
- The only source of contention while starting the autoreloader is importing the urlconf module, relying on unspecified, and until recently buggy, thread safety in
importlib
isn't great. I'd like to be explicit here.
But, then again, this specific issue is fixed in 3.6.3+, so maybe it's not worth it.
comment:18 by , 5 years ago
First of all, I'd like to thank you so much for the amazing research you've done on that issue!
Now saying it's not adding overhead is not completely true, however it's a minimal overhead (creating lock, entering context manager, ...). And what about the other occurrences of import_module
in Django code? I think that at some point we have to trust Python for not regressing in that function. So I still think this should be fixed in Django 2.2 but not in master.
comment:19 by , 5 years ago
Severity: | Normal → Release blocker |
---|
Tom, thanks for the research. I agree with Claude let's fix this only in Django 2.2, we officially support only the latest point release of each Python series.
comment:20 by , 5 years ago
Ok, makes sense. Updated PR against 2.2.x: https://github.com/django/django/pull/11717
comment:21 by , 5 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|---|
Type: | Cleanup/optimization → Bug |
Version: | master → 2.2 |
This has been the case ≈forever I think. (A syntax error has always required a -C and a restart.)
Unless you have a specific patch to suggest this isn't something I want to accept as an active ticket.
(I would say
wontfix
but that's not quite right: if a small change comes along that does the right thing then great, so `needsinfo)Please do reopen if you have a concrete suggestion, preferably as a PR. Thanks.