Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #30249, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 15, 2019, 6:39:57 AM (5 years ago)
Author:
Carlton Gibson

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #30249, comment 6

    v1 v2  
    99Now I know you're not suggesting we get rid of it. My point was that **as an action at a distance** setting controlling the exception handling behaviour, we might well want to phase it out at some point in the future.
    1010
    11 It was the **action at a distance** nature of it that I thought you would equally to me not be keen on.
     11It was the **action at a distance** nature of it that I thought you would, equally to me, not be keen on.
    1212
    1313The point I (really!) imagined that we'd just agree on is that **action at a distance** type code is to be avoided. (Hence my use if "horrific" — using humour as I didn't think it a point where we wouldn't already agree.)
Back to Top