| 1 | | Hi Sagar. This is at least related to #20313. Q: How are you specifying your custom `AnonymousUser` class? |
| | 1 | Hi Sagar. This is at least related to #20313. |
| | 2 | |
| | 3 | Q: How are you specifying your custom `AnonymousUser` class? It seems like we'd need a solution to #20313 before this change would make sense. |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | I'm going to accept this, rather than call it a duplicate, for now. Since #20313 is Accepted this seems a natural follow-up. |
| | 6 | Perhaps your PR could address both issues at once? |
| | 7 | |
| | 8 | The existing tests pass with the patch as is, so nothing broken. That's a good sign. |
| | 9 | |
| | 10 | The PR would need docs and new tests, etc. |