#28563 closed New feature (wontfix)
Allow parent relations to specify the related_name of a class property — at Version 4
Reported by: | Samuel Spencer | Owned by: | tothegump |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Uncategorized | Version: | 1.11 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | yes | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
I didn't even realise that was possible! Cheers.
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Agreed, I think defining fields is a more clear solution than a Meta
option.
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I'm not convinced it's worth adding a
Meta
option for the rare cases when this is required. Explicitly defining your parent link as you've pointed out should do.