#28563 closed New feature (wontfix)
Allow parent relations to specify the related_name of a class property — at Version 4
| Reported by: | Samuel Spencer | Owned by: | tothegump |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Uncategorized | Version: | 1.11 |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | yes | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
I didn't even realise that was possible! Cheers.
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Agreed, I think defining fields is a more clear solution than a Meta option.
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I'm not convinced it's worth adding a
Metaoption for the rare cases when this is required. Explicitly defining your parent link as you've pointed out should do.