Django admin empty_value/empty_value_display doesn't check for empty strings

[Mark Koh]

According to the ​Django documentation, empty_value_display should "display value for record’s fields that are empty (None, empty string, etc.)" However, currently this value is only returned when the field value is None and does not check for empty strings. This can be seen here - ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/5a52d932ef4da8228d82673314341c2c86602248/django/contrib/admin/utils.py#L420

Thus, if you have a CharField with a value of '' (empty string), the empty_value_display value will not appear, contrary to the documentation.

How to reproduce:

• Create a model with a CharField(blank=True, null=True)
• Create a model_admin and add that field to the list_display list
• Create two instances of the model, one with that field set to None and another with it set to '' (empty string)
• Open the admin panel and find those models, you will see that the instance with None shows - but the one with the empty string shows nothing.

[Mark Koh]

Empty strings with no empty_value

[Tim Graham]

I'm not immediately convinced that the behavior should be changed instead of correcting the documentation to reflect the current behavior. Has the behavior changed since the documentation was introduced in 0207bdd2d4157c542c981264c86706b78ca246e9 or was the original documentation inaccurate?

[Mark Koh]

The functionality hasn't changed since the documentation was updated, so it seems as though the original documentation was inaccurate. While I do have a ​PR in for the fix (WIP), I agree that it may make more sense to simply correct the documentation.
On the other hand, I do feel that this functionality would be useful as an additional overridable property for the ModelAdmin. Perhaps as an optional empty_string_display property?

[Tim Graham]

I've grown wearisome of all the ModelAdmin hooks and complexity that they add. That's the only grounds on which I'd object to an additional property. If you have a compelling use case, I guess it's okay. I guess you're finding empty_value_display useful?

[Mark Koh]

I would definitely find it useful if it worked with empty strings as well as None. Currently we have a field in our ModelAdmin that is a CharField with blank=True and null=False and that field is also specified in the list_display_links. Thus, when that field value is an empty string we are unable to click it (you can see this in the image attached to this ticket).

Seeing as the blank=True, null=False method is the recommended method for supporting nullable CharFields I imagine that I'm not the only person whose seen this problem. I am open to either allowing empty_value_display to acknowledge empty strings or to creating a new optional attribute for empty strings.

[Tim Graham]

I don't know if adding a separate property will be simpler than modifying the existing empty_value_display. I guess there could be use cases for a separate value for each case. You could write to the DevelopersMailingList for further feedback.

[shangdahao]

Hi, Nazarov Georgiy, you can't check "Ready for checkin" yourself, please see ​triaging-tickets

[Carlton Gibson]

I haven't yet seen a reason not to re-use empty_value_display here (rather than add a new admin option) but we need to consider when that is applied:

There are some cases where I really do want an empty string displayed (though not in a linked column). Maybe only use it only when it's an auto-linked field/column? Or maybe only use this behavior in display_for_field()? (So if you use a custom function/method, you can still have full control.) — ​Collin Anderson on Django Dev

[Fred Gebala]

Confirming that this is definitely an issue with Django 1.11, and the docs for 1.11 still say this works for empty strings, which it does not: ​https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/ref/contrib/admin/#django.contrib.admin.ModelAdmin.empty_value_display. These docs should be updated to avoid confusion in the future.

[Dominik]

Are there any updates on this?

I just stumbled on this issue when trying to use a "nullable" char field (blank=True, null=False as the docs suggest) in a changelist filter. The filter option for the empty string is displayed as a literal empty string, which results in the surrounding link element collapsing to height 0 and being virtually unusable since you can't click it. The link itself, once accessed via inspector, works fine.

Docs are also unchanged, so what is the verdict on this issue?

[Simon Charette]

Given the db.models.Field has ​an API that defines what empty values should be I think that admin logic should be changed to rely on it?

diff --git a/django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py b/django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py
index 5865843dce..a570026b1e 100644
--- a/django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py
+++ b/django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ def link_in_col(is_first, field_name, cl):
             else:
                 if isinstance(f.remote_field, models.ManyToOneRel):
                     field_val = getattr(result, f.name)
-                    if field_val is None:
+                    if field_val in f.empty_values:
                         result_repr = empty_value_display
                     else:
                         result_repr = field_va

That would at least make the notion of empty coherent between models and the admin. It kind of blurs the line it terms of what change list filtering by empty value mean when there's multiple candidates though (e.g. CharField(blank=True, null=True)). Kind of wish we had an __empty lookup for this purpose that would be an alias for all allowed empty values by the field definition:

class EmptyModel(models.Model):
    text = TextField(blank=True, null=False)
    nullable_text = TextField(blank=True, null=True)
    integer = IntegerField(blank=True, null=True)
    array = ArrayField(TextField(), null=True)
    json = JSONField()

EmptyModel.objects.filter(
    text__empty=True,  # Q(text="")
    nullable_text__empty=True,  # Q(nullable_text="") | Q(nullable_text=None)
    integer__empty=True,  # Q(integer=None)
    array__empty=True,  # Q(array=[]) | Q(array=None)
    json__empty=True,  # Q(json=[]) | Q(json={}) | Q(json=None)
)

If this existed the admin filter could for empty value could basically be __empty=True ​instead of __isnull=True.

[Alexander Lazarević]

After watching how to perform the "vulture method" in (1) I found this ticket.

According to “Claiming” tickets' I reassign this ticket to myself, because "... If a ticket has been assigned for weeks or months without any activity, it’s probably safe to reassign it to yourself." I hope that's ok.

(1) ​https://fosstodon.org/@djangonaut@indieweb.social/111697455678403023

[Sarah Boyce]

Yes that's completely fine - enjoy!

[Alexander Lazarević]

New PR ​https://github.com/django/django/pull/17699

I had to create a fresh PR: ​https://github.com/django/django/pull/17702

[Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@…>]

In 1b0a899:

Refs #28404 -- Split test_null_display_for_field() test.

[Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@…>]

In 9b02ad9:

Fixed #28404 -- Made displaying values in admin respect Field's empty_values.

[Alexander Lazarević]

Yeah! Thanks for your support, Mariusz!

[Alexander Lazarević]

I'm afraid my PR might not have been complete. I just tried something like this:

@admin.register(SomeModel)
class SomeModelAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
    list_display = (
        "name",
        "description",
        "my_description",
    )
    empty_value_display = "-empty-"

    @admin.display(empty_value="-very empty-")
    def my_description(self, obj):
        return ""  # obj.description

and it did not show the "-very empty-" string.

I guess this needs to be changed as well:

def display_for_value(value, empty_value_display, boolean=False):
    from django.contrib.admin.templatetags.admin_list import _boolean_icon

    if boolean:
        return _boolean_icon(value)

    elif value is None:              <-------------------------
        return empty_value_display

    elif isinstance(value, bool):
        return str(value)
...

Can somebody please confirm this? Sorry for not seeing it earlier ...

[Mariusz Felisiak]

Agreed, let's reopen.

[Alexander Lazarević]

Additional PR ​https://github.com/django/django/pull/17720

[Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@…>]

In 4787972:

Refs #28404 -- Made displaying property values in admin respect non-None empty values.