Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#27860 closed Bug
Changing a CharField to a ForeignKey explodes when migrating in PostgreSQL — at Version 2
Reported by: | Daniel Quinn | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Migrations | Version: | 1.10 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | PostgreSQL |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
If I have a model that looks like this:
class MyModel(models.Model): my_field = models.CharField(max_length=128, db_index=True)
makemigrations
will create a migration that looks like this:
migrations.CreateModel( name='MyModel', fields=[ ('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')), ('my_field', models.CharField(db_index=True, max_length=128)), ], ),
However, if I later change the field to a ForeignKey
:
class MyOtherModel(models.Model): stuff = models.CharField(max_length=128) class MyModel(models.Model): my_field = models.ForeignKey("alpha.MyOtherModel", blank=True)
makemigrations
will create this:
migrations.AlterField( model_name='mymodel', name='my_field', field=models.ForeignKey(blank=True, on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, to='alpha.MyOtherModel'), ),
...which explodes in PostgreSQL (but not SQLite or MySQL) with this:
psycopg2.ProgrammingError: operator class "varchar_pattern_ops" does not accept data type integer
The fix (at least for my case) was to manually break up the AlterField
into separate RemoveField
and AddField
steps like this:
migrations.RemoveField( model_name='mymodel', name='my_field', ), migrations.AddField( model_name='mymodel', name='my_field', field=models.ForeignKey(blank=True, on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, to='alpha.MyOtherModel'), ),
I ran into this on my own GPL project, and the issue history wherein we found and fixed the problem is here: https://github.com/danielquinn/paperless/issues/183
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
alpha.MyOtherModel
is using a default numeric key. Sorry, I should have included that in the ticket and so I've modified it to include the MyOtherModel
class.
The problem is that migrations is doing an alter
for a field that changed not just from a CharField
to a ForeignKeyField
but rather to a foreign key of a different type. SQLite and MySQL somehow didn't have a problem with this, but PostgreSQL exploded.
Perhaps a solution would be a warning stage not unlike the prompt you get when trying to add a field with no default=
value? Something like:
It looks like you've changed a CharField to a ForeignKey of a different type. This will generate an AddField and RemoveField. Is that cool with you?
I couldn't reproduce a problem with these final models:
Does "alpha.MyOtherModel" have a
CharField
primary key?I'm not sure what the proper resolution would be here, considering that automatically generating
RemoveField
/AddField
would be data loss operations.