Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#27475 closed Bug (fixed)
Bug in admin with date_hierarchy and Daylight savings
Reported by: | Hugo Tácito | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.admin | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | desecho@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
When I have a date_hierarchy in admin and I select a range with a record with the day equal the day of a daylight savings I got an error of NonExistentTimeError.
I discovered that indeed 2016-10-16 00:00:00 does not exist in my Timezone ('America/Sao_Paulo') because that was when Daylight Savings started.
So when I have a record with that date in my database, it will brake the date_hierarchy feature.
Attachments (1)
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Hello Tim,
I'm sorry for my lack of information and clarity, but even if I do have an existing datetime the problem still occur.
For example I have a User with date_joined equals 2016-10-16 12:17:44.270221-03 and when I select a date_hierarchy filter, that still raise the same exception of:
NonExistentTimeError at /admin/auth/user/
2016-10-16 00:00:00
Even with an existing datetime.
The admin I did to test:
class UserAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): date_hierarchy = 'date_joined' list_display = ('email', 'first_name', 'last_name', 'date_joined') list_filter = ('is_staff', 'is_superuser') admin.site.unregister(User) admin.site.register(User, UserAdmin)
The internationalization settings:
LANGUAGE_CODE = 'pt-br' TIME_ZONE = 'America/Sao_Paulo' USE_I18N = True USE_L10N = True USE_TZ = True
With TIME_ZONE = 'UTC' the problem doesn't occur.
Edit:
I've did this in a new clean project, with just this object at the User model.
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
This also happens if we set a datetime to 2015-10-18. For example: 2015-10-18 10:45:29.270221-03
In 2015 at 10-18 was started the daylight savings at Brazil too.
https://www.timeanddate.com/time/change/brazil/sao-paulo?year=2015
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
Hello Tim,
It seems that the datetime truncation is too hard in the date_hierarchy templatetag.
Changing this line:
https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py#L385
to:
days = getattr(days, dates_or_datetimes)(field_name, 'second')
Probably will fix it.
I can also create a patch if you want.
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
The problem seems to stem from the fact that Django wants dates, but fetches them as datetimes, and applies the converter for datetimes, which causes an exception in that case.
It isn't possible to represent "2016-10-16 in local time in São Paulo" as datetime.datetime(2016, 10, 16, tzinfo=pytz.timezone('America/Sao_Paulo'))
because that value doesn't exist. The only proper way to represent it is datetime.date(2016, 10, 16)
.
I believe the resolution should be along the lines of making the year / month / day truncation expressions cast their result to a DateField instead of a DateTimeField. Reducing the problem to a lower-level test case may help.
It seems possible that the same problem could occur with the hour truncation expression if some time zones have their DST between 1:30 and 2:30. I'm not sure what we could do about that; it seems much harder to fix.
by , 8 years ago
Attachment: | djtest.zip added |
---|
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Version: | 1.10 → master |
I've attached a django project to reproduce the problem. Admin credentials - admin/AiNeuw3uOhvei7da
To reproduce, open /admin/app/test/?date__month=10&date__year=2016
comment:9 by , 8 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
comment:10 by , 8 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
I'm not sure what the expected behavior is. What could Django do if you have bad data?