#27128 closed Bug (needsinfo)
A method model.objects.get(pk=obj.pk) returns many objects, but in a database is one.
Reported by: | Seti | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Uncategorized | Version: | 1.9 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | GenericRelation, Testing, Models |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
Very strange behaviour of the Django ORM while testing (now I am using pytest)
I have two apps "books" and "replies".
The app "books" has two models http://pastebin.com/gDMi7UpU
The app "replies" has one model http://pastebin.com/u9FabQQA
For create new objects I am using factories for replies - http://pastebin.com/pGtiwS2m, for books and writers - http://pastebin.com/NQ6AWxib
While testing methods of queryset of the model Book I got error, where it should not be
A file querysets.py of the app "books" http://pastebin.com/FVnLLzxK
Tests for the file querysets.py of the app "books" http://pastebin.com/rmpDm0Ae
For testing I am using the pytest with next configuration in a file pytest.ini
[pytest] addopts = -s --reuse-db --ff --maxfail=1 apps/books/tests/test_querysets.py::Tests DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=config.settings.development
Run test as next py.test
Traceback http://pastebin.com/Vv96XLzm
After many time googling and dipping in the Django`s code by the traceback I decided it is bug in the Django
I think it is the problem related with that models the Book and the Reply is related by help the field GenericRelation, but I don`t found facts for it.
Sorry for my grammar mistakes, I was no originally an English
If need another codes from my project, please tell about it
Update
Same error I had when tested a method "get_admin_url()" of the model Book with next a testing code
def test_get_admin_url(self): self.client.force_login(self.active_superuser) response = self.client.get(self.book.get_admin_url()) self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
Ending a traceback
if not num: raise self.model.DoesNotExist( "%s matching query does not exist." % self.model._meta.object_name ) raise self.model.MultipleObjectsReturned( "get() returned more than one %s -- it returned %s!" % > (self.model._meta.object_name, num) ) E apps.books.models.MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than one Book -- it returned 3!
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → needsinfo |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Replying to timgraham:
Yes, we need a minimal project (or a test case for Django's test suite, if possible) without any third-party apps to rule out a bug there. Please reopen if you can provide that -- and attach it to the ticket since pastebin posts will expire soon.
Here two problems:
- If is variant with minimal project, be taken into account that I using the factory_boy for generate fake objects (it is third-party app)
- What is "test case for Django's test suite"? How to made it to you?
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Yes, we need a project without factory_boy
to ensure that the problem isn't in that library.
You can read about Django's test suite in our contributing docs.
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
Replying to timgraham:
Yes, we need a project without
factory_boy
to ensure that the problem isn't in that library.
You can read about Django's test suite in our contributing docs.
After many hours debug my code I found a next problem
(Pdb) get_user_model().objects.all() [<User: deniserobertson@schmidt-clark.com>, <User: othompson@adams-hess.com>, <User: salazarkatherine@gonzalez-bennett.org>, <User: knash@hotmail.com>, <User: maykristi@mahoney.info>, <User: robingonzalez@long.com>, <User: michaelbaker@hotmail.com>, <User: corygill@gmail.com>] (Pdb) get_user_model().objects.all()[0] <User: deniserobertson@schmidt-clark.com> (Pdb) get_user_model().objects.all()[1] <User: deniserobertson@schmidt-clark.com> (Pdb) get_user_model().objects.all()[2] <User: deniserobertson@schmidt-clark.com> (Pdb) get_user_model().objects.all()[3] <User: knash@hotmail.com> (Pdb) get_user_model().objects.all()[4] <User: maykristi@mahoney.info> (Pdb) get_user_model().objects.all()[5] <User: robingonzalez@long.com>
Problem with a user`s model. It on index [0] [1] and [2] return the same user. It leads to dublication in my replies.
If you know same problem, may be it fixed in the Django 1.10, if not know - I will still debug.
I wait your response
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 8 years ago
If the queryset isn't ordered, each time you index get_user_model().objects.all()
, there's no guarantee that the results will be in the same order. Try indexing get_user_model().objects.order_by('pk')
instead.
follow-up: 8 comment:7 by , 8 years ago
Replying to timgraham:
If the queryset isn't ordered, each time you index
get_user_model().objects.all()
, there's no guarantee that the results will be in the same order. Try indexingget_user_model().objects.order_by('pk')
instead.
Your method given me properly results
users = get_user_model().objects.order_by('pk') print(users) users[0], users[1], users[2], users[3], users[4], users[5]
[<User: blackmelissa@gutierrez.com>, <User: greencarl@francis-brock.com>, <User: admin@admin.com>, <User: christopher19@gmail.com>, <User: jane85@gmail.com>, <User: scott99@gmail.com>, <User: ann91@hotmail.com>, <User: patricia19@yahoo.com>, <User: zfuller@jones.com>]
(<User: blackmelissa@gutierrez.com>,
<User: greencarl@francis-brock.com>,
<User: admin@admin.com>,
<User: christopher19@gmail.com>,
<User: jane85@gmail.com>,
<User: scott99@gmail.com>)
My default code still return not properly results
users = get_user_model().objects.all() print(users) users[0], users[1], users[2], users[3], users[4], users[5]
[<User: admin@admin.com>, <User: zfuller@jones.com>, <User: ann91@hotmail.com>, <User: scott99@gmail.com>, <User: greencarl@francis-brock.com>, <User: patricia19@yahoo.com>, <User: christopher19@gmail.com>, <User: blackmelissa@gutierrez.com>, <User: jane85@gmail.com>]
(<User: admin@admin.com>,
<User: admin@admin.com>,
<User: admin@admin.com>,
<User: admin@admin.com>,
<User: greencarl@francis-brock.com>,
<User: patricia19@yahoo.com>)
But it not resolve my problem, because my user`s models has default sorting by Last_login (see SQL)
Sorting for the model if I override it
print(get_user_model().objects.only('pk').order_by('pk').query)
SELECT "user"."id" FROM "user" ORDER BY "user"."id" ASC
Sorting for the model by default is by last_login of users
print(get_user_model().objects.only('pk').query)
SELECT "user"."id" FROM "user" ORDER BY "user"."last_login" DESC
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 8 years ago
Replying to setivolkylany:
Hi,
You are unlikely to get any more responses on this ticket -- it looks like your original problem is not caused by a bug in Django, and now you have started to ask about a different issue.
Please use the support channels (#django IRC channel, django-users mailing list) to ask more questions.
comment:9 by , 8 years ago
Replying to shaib:
Replying to setivolkylany:
Hi,
You are unlikely to get any more responses on this ticket -- it looks like your original problem is not caused by a bug in Django, and now you have started to ask about a different issue.
Please use the support channels (#django IRC channel, django-users mailing list) to ask more questions.
I just made an assumption, but I just in case I am sorry about it, if this caused offence in you
And about the the #django IRC channel the django-users mailing list much help there can not be obtained
So, I am try to resolve my problems alone.
Yes, we need a minimal project (or a test case for Django's test suite, if possible) without any third-party apps to rule out a bug there. Please reopen if you can provide that -- and attach it to the ticket since pastebin posts will expire soon.