Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#27002 closed Cleanup/optimization
Redundant database query rendering a ModelChoiceField with RadioSelect or CheckboxSelectMultiple — at Initial Version
Reported by: | Alex Hill | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Forms | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Followup to #27001:
Rendering a ModelChoiceField with RadioSelect and CheckboxSelectMultiple, there's a redundant iteration that triggers an unnecessary database call.
Here's the relevant code from ForNode.render (GitHub link):
if not hasattr(values, '__len__'): # line 164 values = list(values) len_values = len(values) ... for i, item in enumerate(values): # line 177 ...
In this code, values
is a BoundField. BoundField defines \len like this:
def __len__(self): return len(list(self.__iter__()))
So len(values)
on line 164 triggers an iteration over values
(and thus a database query), then the for loop at line 177 triggers another.
The options as I see them are
- Remove
BoundField.__len__
so thatlist(values)
is called inForNode.render
. This fixes the problem without breaking any tests. It is backwards-incompatible (e.g. with an existing template passing a boundfield to thelength
template filter), but not with anything documented. - Cache iterator results somewhere internally so that the actual query is only executed once. This is easy to do on BoundField with a cached property. No backward compatibility concerns here.
- Unconditionally call
list(values)
in ForNode. Also works, but a bit heavy-handed and not necessary if one of the first two options are acceptable.
I think (2) is the best choice. It's pretty clean, and it means the fix can be implemented in 1.10 (and 1.8 LTS?) as a bug fix without backward compatibility concerns.