Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #26942, comment 5
- Timestamp:
- Jul 31, 2016, 11:50:47 AM (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #26942, comment 5
initial v1 5 5 At the least, it seems like the tests should test the code paths of (1) a successful and (2) a failing subtest in a somewhat end-to-end fashion. The success case can easily be met simply by including a test containing a subtest (which would suffice assuming the tests are already being run in parallel mode). 6 6 7 But for the failing case, we don't want to don't want tointerfere with the test run itself. In my first attempt at programmatically instantiating and running a ParallelTestSuite within a test case, I got the following error (because it was running a parallel test within a parallel test):7 But for the failing case, we don't want to interfere with the test run itself. In my first attempt at programmatically instantiating and running a ParallelTestSuite within a test case, I got the following error (because it was running a parallel test within a parallel test): 8 8 9 9 {{{