Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #26942, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 31, 2016, 11:50:47 AM (8 years ago)
Author:
Chris Jerdonek

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #26942, comment 5

    initial v1  
    55At the least, it seems like the tests should test the code paths of (1) a successful and (2) a failing subtest in a somewhat end-to-end fashion. The success case can easily be met simply by including a test containing a subtest (which would suffice assuming the tests are already being run in parallel mode).
    66
    7 But for the failing case, we don't want to don't want to interfere with the test run itself. In my first attempt at programmatically instantiating and running a ParallelTestSuite within a test case, I got the following error (because it was running a parallel test within a parallel test):
     7But for the failing case, we don't want to interfere with the test run itself. In my first attempt at programmatically instantiating and running a ParallelTestSuite within a test case, I got the following error (because it was running a parallel test within a parallel test):
    88
    99{{{
Back to Top