Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 7 weeks ago
#24342 new New feature
Add EnumField model/form fields — at Version 28
Reported by: | Thomas Stephenson | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | frewsxcv, andre@…, Tom Forbes, Krzysztof Szularz, Olivier Tabone, Kye Russell, Semyon Pupkov, Stefan Foulis, Ryan Hiebert, Safwan Rahman, Sébastien Fievet, Paolo Melchiorre, Cesar Canassa, Duane Hutchins, Hannes Ljungberg, Adam Johnson, George Sakkis, kimsia, Olivier Dalang, Ülgen Sarıkavak, Tilman Koschnick | Triage Stage: | Someday/Maybe |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
Add support for an EnumField
which is backed by the corresponding enum
type if one exists in the database engine (eg. mysql, postgres), with a default implementation of CharField in other database types and mapped to instances of the enum.Enum
.
Change History (28)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Needs documentation: | set |
---|---|
Needs tests: | set |
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Type: | Uncategorized → New feature |
---|
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
For us, it has replaced the use of choices everywhere, although we don't use django forms (django only powers our REST API). The enum names are stored in the database column and the implementation is agnostic to the enum values. Our implementation is currently postgres specific, but should be relatively easily to make generic.
But there are (dubious) use cases supported by choices that can't be easily filled by enums (such as defining named groups of values in a <select>
form element), so I don't think choices can be deprecated entirely. Perhaps an optional form_groups
argument to EnumField
would satisfy this use case if a decision to deprecate choices were made in response to this.
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Version: | 1.7 → master |
---|
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
Could you please raise the issue on the DevelopersMailingList to see if there is consensus to add this to core?
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
Needs documentation: | unset |
---|---|
Needs tests: | unset |
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Someday/Maybe |
The mailing list thread didn't reveal a strong consensus to add this to core at this time. My sense is that it might be more appealing once the minimum version of Python that Django supports has enums (3.4+).
The mailing list thread also noted django-enumfields as an active third-party implementation.
follow-up: 8 comment:7 by , 10 years ago
Summary: | Add an EnumField as standard → Add EnumField model/form fields |
---|
comment:8 by , 9 years ago
Replying to timgraham:
The mailing list thread also noted django-enumfields as an active third-party implementation.
It's worth noting though that django-enumfields is CharField-based and doesn't use the database-specific enum types. So it's not a full replacement for the feature requested here.
comment:9 by , 9 years ago
If someone (maybe myself?) wrote a PostgreSQL specific EnumField
, could it be added to django.contrib.postgres
?
comment:10 by , 9 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:11 by , 9 years ago
The idea of a PostgreSQL-specific field was rejected on the mailing list thread link in comment:6. Quoting Josh Smeaton:
I definitely do not like the idea of building a feature into contrib.postgres that could be built for the rest of the database backends too. It seems like a cop-out for doing less work, and really promotes one built in backend above others. contrib.postgres should be a place for postgres specific features, not for cutting out other backends.
comment:12 by , 8 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:13 by , 7 years ago
Now that the next version of Django will drop support for Python versions <3.5, will pull requests for this feature be considered?
Also thought it was worth mentioning https://github.com/5monkeys/django-enumfield although it seems like it's no longer maintained and lacks support from Django 1.8.
comment:14 by , 7 years ago
Yes, a patch would certainly help advance the conversation -- particularly if you can highlight the advantages of this as part of Django rather than as a third-party package.
comment:15 by , 7 years ago
I'm interested in implementing this feature, but I have a question regarding backend support.
MySQL and PostgreSQL both have native types to support this feature, but SQLite and Oracle don't.
How should we go about supporting this feature on those two databases?
comment:16 by , 7 years ago
I've implemented a POC that uses postgres and mysql enums (and will add a fail to char for others) handling all the migrations cases (changing enum, adding/removing values, etc).
https://github.com/ashleywaite/django-more/tree/master/django_enum
Is a pull to add these changes something that will be considered?
comment:17 by , 7 years ago
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) → HTTP handling |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Someday/Maybe → Accepted |
Yes, please!
comment:18 by , 7 years ago
Component: | HTTP handling → Database layer (models, ORM) |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Someday/Maybe |
comment:19 by , 7 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:20 by , 7 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:21 by , 7 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:22 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:23 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:24 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:25 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:26 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:27 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:28 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
This sounds like a good idea considering the new
enum
type in Python 3.4, but theenum34
package would have to be added to Django's requirements to support backwards compatibility for versions < 3.4.Would this basically replace the need to use choices in
CharField
?