#17747 closed Bug (duplicate)
BooleanField on ModelForms in ModelAdmin is always True
Reported by: | Cochise Ruhulessin | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Forms | Version: | 1.4-beta-1 |
Severity: | Release blocker | Keywords: | booleanfield, modelform, modeladmin |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
When viewing an existing object in a ModelAdmin, it's BooleanFields are always True (checked), even if values in the database/on the model instance are not. This problem occured on 17575, and re-installing 1.3.1 solved the problem.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Consider the following:
class DirectoryForm(forms.ModelForm) def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): instance = kwargs.get('instance', None) if instance: is_enabled = instance.enabled model2dict = forms.models.model_to_dict(instance) super(DirectoryForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) enabled_field_value = self.fields['enabled'].initial raise Exception class Meta: model = Directory
The traceback prints out this:
▼ Local vars is_enabled = 0 model2dict = { 'directory_id': 23L, 'directory_name': u'video', 'directory_path': u'video', 'enabled': 0, 'public': 1, 'remote': 0, 'storage': u'local', 'temporary': 0, 'virtual': 0 } self = <django.forms.models.DirectoryForm object at 0x35cef90> args = () instance = <Directory: Directory object> enabled_field_value = True kwargs = {'instance': <Directory: Directory object>}
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Can't reproduce that wither with r17575 and this when trying to edit a already existing instance of ModelThree that has its boolean field set to False:
# admin.py class ModelThreeForm(forms.ModelForm): def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): instance = kwargs.get('instance', None) if instance: boolean_field_value1 = instance.boolean_field model2dict = forms.models.model_to_dict(instance) super(ModelThreeForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) boolean_field_value2 = self.fields['boolean_field'].initial raise Exception class Meta: model = ModelThree class ModelThreeAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): form = ModelThreeForm admin.site.register(ModelThree, ModelThreeAdmin)
model2dict {'boolean_field': False, 'id': 1} self <django.forms.models.ModelThreeForm object at 0x159e890> args () instance <ModelThree: ModelThree object> kwargs {'instance': <ModelThree: ModelThree object>} boolean_field_value1 False boolean_field_value2 False
Please don't reopen this ticket as this doesn't appear to be an error in Django code. Try to seek help in the django-users mailing list or the #django IRC channel @ Freenode.
Also, for future reports, please provide a simple test case (reducing your model(s) to its minimal expression showing the buggy behavior).
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → Forms |
---|---|
Resolution: | worksforme |
Status: | closed → reopened |
There's a thread on the django-developers list indicating that perhaps this bug exists only on MySQL, and perhaps only on the MySQL GIS backend. I don't have time to verify at this moment (don't have MySQL GIS set up), but to be on the safe side I'm going to reopen this (and mark it as a release blocker, since apparently the symptom in form checkboxes is a regression from 1.3) until I have time to reproduce.
Setting the component to "forms", although if the mailing list thread is correct, it sounds like the correct fix here may in fact be in the MySQL GIS backend, so that it returns True
/False
rather than 1/0 from the database.
We'd also need to consider whether the checkbox change in 1.4 is itself a problematic backwards incompatibility, since in effect it now requires third-party DB backends to return True
/False
from boolean fields rather than 1/0. I don't know if in practice there are any third-party db backends that return 1/0.
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
It looks like #15169 is already tracking the root problem in the db backend. So the only remaining question for this ticket is whether it's acceptable to now require that db backends return True
/False
from boolean fields in order for checkboxes in a ModelForm
to work correctly.
follow-up: 8 comment:7 by , 13 years ago
IMO the database backends should return the most appropriate type under all circumstances — here, booleans.
Loose typing in the ORM leads to backwards-compatibility headaches and problems with no good solution, like the datetime/date can of worms.
comment:8 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Replying to aaugustin:
IMO the database backends should return the most appropriate type under all circumstances — here, booleans.
Loose typing in the ORM leads to backwards-compatibility headaches and problems with no good solution, like the datetime/date can of worms.
Agreed. And given that returning 0/1 for boolean values in built-in DB backends has long been considered a bug in that backend, I no longer even think this justifies a note in the release notes. Closing this as a duplicate of #15169.
comment:9 by , 13 years ago
FWIW I can confirm the problem reported here happens with when the active DB backend is the MySQL spatial one.
I can't reproduce what's reported by this ticket using this setup: