Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#16767 closed Bug (invalid)
get_or_create does not raise error even though i didn't give a primary key to it
Reported by: | haandol | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | 1.3 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | model, get_or_create |
Cc: | anssi.kaariainen@…, adammckerlie@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
here is the example model
class User(models.Model): id = models.CharField(max_length=128, primary_key=True) email = models.EmailField(unique=True) created = models.DateField(auto_now_add=True)
and here is view code
user, isnew = User.objects.get_or_create(email='setsquaretech@gmail.com')
I expected the prev view code raises a kind of database error, but it added a record on the database with 'empty primary key' normally.
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
I can see the bug here - the get_or_create will create a user with id = . That seems confusing. The reason is probably the treatment of None as empty string (not that I have actually verified this is the case).
The same problem is with .save(), User(email='foobar@…').save() will save a user with id = .
In effect CharField
has a default value of , and I guess that for primary keys that is not the wanted behavior.
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
What would you have it be set as though? A character primary key can be anything. Wouldn't having it as:
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
be a better?
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
This is actually consistent with the docs. You can only create one instance in the DB of the object with a PK of without error, if you try to create another user object with this same primary key - you will get the integrity error as documented. In other words may be silly as a PK, but is valid.
If this is a bug this is a bug at a lower level of the model.save - as that only generates an error if you specify a conflicting PK, when using a manual PK.
If this is not a bug, then it should be considered a candidate for clarification in the documentation, as it is completely ambiguous about the behavior you should expect.
One could argue that if a PK is required in the model (which is specified in the docs) then it could be argued that a PK value should be required.