Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #11240, comment 30


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 7, 2013, 12:38:08 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
Ramiro Morales

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #11240, comment 30

    v1 v2  
    99These aren't invalid Python format specifiers. "% s" is a valid one. Can you re-test with a %-prefixed sequence that is actually invalid?
    1010
    11 >
    12 > {{{
    13 > $ xgettext -V
    14 > xgettext (GNU gettext-tools) 0.18.2
    15 > }}}
    16 >
    17 > Why would this be the case? Is this expected behaviour? If so, replacing `%` by `%%` makes no sense and that changeset should be reverted.
Back to Top