Ticket #2195: generic_relation_modeltests_spelling.diff

trunk/tests/modeltests/generic_relations/models.py

@@ -5 +5 @@
 content-type/object-id field. A generic foreign key can point to any object,
 be it animal, vegetable, or mineral.
 
-The cannonical example is tags (although this example implementation is *far*
+The canonical example is tags (although this example implementation is *far*
 from complete).
 """
 
@@ -85 +85 @@
 <Vegetable: Bacon>
 
 # Recall that the Mineral class doesn't have an explicit GenericRelation
-# defined. That's OK since you can create TaggedItems explicitally.
+# defined. That's OK since you can create TaggedItems explicitly.
 >>> tag1 = TaggedItem(content_object=quartz, tag="shiny")
 >>> tag2 = TaggedItem(content_object=quartz, tag="clearish")
 >>> tag1.save()
 >>> tag2.save()
 
-# However, not having the convience takes a small toll when it comes
+# However, not having the convenience takes a small toll when it comes
 # to do lookups
 >>> from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
 >>> ctype = ContentType.objects.get_for_model(quartz)
@@ -105 +105 @@
 [<TaggedItem: shiny>]
 >>> TaggedItem.objects.filter(content_type__pk=ctype.id, object_id=quartz.id)
 [<TaggedItem: clearish>]
-"""
- No newline at end of file
+"""