Opened 17 years ago

Closed 16 years ago

Last modified 13 years ago

#6967 closed (fixed)

ModelForms doesn't validate CHOICES

Reported by: johannes.spielmann@… Owned by: Jacob
Component: Forms Version: dev
Severity: Keywords:
Cc: simon@…, carl@…, ville@…, pat.j.anderson@…, web@… Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

A ModelForm with a CharField, that has CHOICES set, presents to the user only the specified CHOICES. But it does not _validate_ against the CHOICES, which allows a crafted response to write arbitrary values to the field.

Attachments (3)

choices-fix.patch (601 bytes ) - added by Simon Willison 17 years ago.
6967-tests.diff (1.4 KB ) - added by Matt McClanahan 16 years ago.
Some tests for choices on CharField and IntegerField.
6967-r8772-tests.diff (604 bytes ) - added by Matt McClanahan 16 years ago.
New failing test

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (23)

by Simon Willison, 17 years ago

Attachment: choices-fix.patch added

comment:1 by Simon Willison, 17 years ago

Attached patch appears to fix this, but needs tests.

comment:2 by anonymous, 17 years ago

Cc: simon@… added

comment:3 by edgarsj, 17 years ago

Triage Stage: UnreviewedAccepted

comment:4 by Matt McClanahan, 16 years ago

milestone: 1.0

by Matt McClanahan, 16 years ago

Attachment: 6967-tests.diff added

Some tests for choices on CharField and IntegerField.

comment:5 by Jacob, 16 years ago

Owner: changed from nobody to Jacob
Status: newassigned

comment:6 by Jacob, 16 years ago

(In [8771]) Added a TypedChoiceField which acts just like ChoiceField, except that it
returns a value coerced by some provided function. Refs #6967.

comment:7 by Jacob, 16 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

(In [8772]) Fixed #6967: ModelForms now validate choices. Thanks, mattmcc -- the failing test helped quite a bit.

comment:8 by Matt McClanahan, 16 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closedreopened

The test was insufficient, unfortunately. Field.formfield is going to need to cope with other model field types that set arbitrary arguments in their defaults dict which would make sense for the form field they expect to use, but won't make sense to TypedChoiceField. The only built-in examples of this are PositiveIntegerField and PositiveSmallIntegerField, which pass a min_value argument.

We could pop off min_value as max_length is being popped now, but it's just fixing the symptom. A custom model field could set anything.

by Matt McClanahan, 16 years ago

Attachment: 6967-r8772-tests.diff added

New failing test

comment:9 by Chris Beaven, 16 years ago

I fell across this just now too. For now I just changed my local copy of the pop() line to:

kwargs = kwargs.get('choices_kwargs', {})

Still not the nicest solution, but it isn't as bad as the current one.

comment:10 by Antti Kaihola, 16 years ago

Has patch: set

comment:11 by Carl Meyer, 16 years ago

Cc: carl@… added

comment:12 by James Bennett, 16 years ago

#8744 was a duplicate.

comment:13 by Ville Säävuori, 16 years ago

Cc: ville@… added

comment:14 by anonymous, 16 years ago

Cc: pat.j.anderson@… added

comment:15 by anonymous, 16 years ago

Cc: web@… added

comment:16 by Jacob, 16 years ago

BTW, in the future please open a new ticket for things of this nature.

comment:17 by Jacob, 16 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: reopenedclosed

(In [8806]) Repaired an oversight from [8772] that let made certain types of fields with choices fail. Fixes #6967 again.

comment:18 by Stavros Korokithakis, 16 years ago

I'm getting this bug as well (running latest trunk as of two minutes ago). Here is my traceback:

Validating models...
Unhandled exception in thread started by <function inner_run at 0x6aef70>
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/runserver.py", line 48, in inner_run
    self.validate(display_num_errors=True)
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 249, in validate
    num_errors = get_validation_errors(s, app)
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/core/management/validation.py", line 28, in get_validation_errors
    for (app_name, error) in get_app_errors().items():
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/loading.py", line 131, in get_app_errors
    self._populate()
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/loading.py", line 58, in _populate
    self.load_app(app_name, True)
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/loading.py", line 74, in load_app
    models = import_module('.models', app_name)
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/utils/importlib.py", line 35, in import_module
    __import__(name)
  File "/Users/stavros/Code/Django/head/main/models.py", line 215, in <module>
    class AdType(models.Model):
  File "/Users/stavros/Code/Django/head/main/models.py", line 221, in AdType
    price = models.DecimalField(_("price"), max_digits=6, decimal_places=2, min_value=0)
  File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py", line 589, in __init__
    Field.__init__(self, verbose_name, name, **kwargs)
TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'min_value'

I'm not sure what this means, but I can't launch my server.

comment:19 by Stavros Korokithakis, 16 years ago

I'm sorry, disregard my post above. I shouldn't post bug reports while sleepless...

comment:20 by Jacob, 13 years ago

milestone: 1.0

Milestone 1.0 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top