#4667 closed (fixed)
[newforms-admin] add edit_inline support for generic relations
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Brian Rosner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | contrib.admin | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Keywords: | nfa-someday edit_inline generic content_type sprintsept14 ep2008 | |
| Cc: | paltman@…, simon@…, semente@…, peschler@…, prufrocks@…, smcoll@…, dev@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I have a model that looks like (working example)
from django.db import models
from django.contrib.contenttypes import generic
from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
class Dependency( models.Model ):
target_ct = models.ForeignKey( ContentType, related_name='dependency_for_set' )
target_id = models.IntegerField()
target = generic.GenericForeignKey( 'target_ct', 'target_id' )
source_ct = models.ForeignKey( ContentType, related_name='dependent_on_set' )
source_id = models.IntegerField()
source = generic.GenericForeignKey( 'source_ct', 'source_id' )
and I want to be able to edit it inline with other models, but the current implementations only support edit_inline for foreign key relations. With the attached patch I can do something like this:
from django.contrib import admin
class SomeModel( models.Model ):
text = models.TextField()
class SomeModelOptions( admin.ModelAdmin ):
inlines = [ admin.TabularInline( Dependency, name='source_ct:source_id', formset=generic.GenericInlineFormset ), ]
admin.site.register( SomeModel , SomeModelOptions )
The patch is very rough, but working (tested adding and editing).
I have some questions for the authors (I will post it to django-dev):
- InlineFormset.rel_name is not really applicable in this case, what would be best to use as a prefix (the value in tha patch -
'aaa'is far from ideal ;) ) - I moved some of the functionality to FormSet (add_fk), to allow for custom binding between objects and use
content_type_field:object_id_fieldas the foreign key name to pass that information. I feel that its not the most elegant solution, could anybody help me out here with some ideas?
btw. Great work, Joseph Kocherhans, your implementation of edit_inline really made this easy for me, thanks.
Attachments (10)
Change History (38)
by , 18 years ago
| Attachment: | newforms-admin-5519-generic-edit-inline.patch added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
Just a minor style note: the preferred style for Django patches is to do function(arg), not function( arg ), following the lead of PEP 8.
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
| Patch needs improvement: | set |
|---|
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:4 by , 18 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|
by , 18 years ago
| Attachment: | newforms-admin-5519-generic-edit-inline-sprint14sep.patch added |
|---|
version matching django @6158
comment:5 by , 18 years ago
So first of all, the name='object_id:content_type' syntax is just too dirty. It seems like we should be able to provide *just* the name of the GenericForeignKey field, then use its ct_field and fk_field attributes to get what we need. If that isn't possible, I'd much rather use 2 different arguments, something like ct_field and fk_field.
Also, I *think* we could use the existing FormSet.add_fields hook instead of adding a new add_fk method like in the patch.
Keep in mind that I may be missing something here. These are my initial impressions, but they may not end up working in practice. I haven't worked all the way through it.
comment:6 by , 18 years ago
| Keywords: | sprintsept14 added |
|---|
comment:7 by , 18 years ago
Replying to jkocherhans:
So first of all, the
name='object_id:content_type'syntax is just too dirty. It seems like we should be able to provide *just* the name of theGenericForeignKeyfield, then use itsct_fieldandfk_fieldattributes to get what we need. If that isn't possible, I'd much rather use 2 different arguments, something likect_fieldandfk_field.
I dont want that because I often don't have GenericForeignKey defined - it is a modular system and I do not want to modify every model that can use the generic relation. so for that I would have to override the InlineModelAdmin as well to provide two options - ct_name and id_name, but that's certainly an option...
Also, I *think* we could use the existing
FormSet.add_fieldshook instead of adding a newadd_fkmethod like in the patch.
The reason for this is that the patch existed before that hooks were added, I just did a small update to match the current version... I will have a look at that
Keep in mind that I may be missing something here. These are my initial impressions, but they may not end up working in practice. I haven't worked all the way through it.
comment:8 by , 18 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
|---|
by , 18 years ago
| Attachment: | newforms-admin-6426-generic-edit-inline.patch added |
|---|
Matching django version 6426
by , 18 years ago
| Attachment: | newforms-admin-6477-generic-edit-inline.patch added |
|---|
Matching django version 6477
comment:9 by , 18 years ago
I moved all the code except few things (enable formset overriding and something to prevent circular imports) out of admin and directly into contenttypes.generic
This will enable me to specify my generic inlines like
class ListingInlineOptions( generic.GenericTabularInline ):
model = Listing
extra = 2
ct_field_name = 'target_ct'
id_field_name = 'target_id'
The downside is that I am duplicating some code in contenttypes.generic
There are few more things to do:
- Find better names than
id_field_nameandct_field_name - Enable this to work with autodetection and/or
GenericForeignKey - clean-up the code in
contenttypes.generic(maybe refactor admin a bit to enable getting rid of some boilerplate code) - Enjoy :)
by , 18 years ago
| Attachment: | 4667-added-custom-formset.diff added |
|---|
new two-part patch for django @6657 (first part)
by , 18 years ago
| Attachment: | 4667-generic_edit_inline.diff added |
|---|
new two-part patch for django @6657 (second part)
comment:10 by , 18 years ago
I split the patch into two parts, one handling the custom formset overrides, the second actually implementing the feature.
comment:11 by , 18 years ago
| Keywords: | nfa-someday added |
|---|
This functionality is not critical before the merge to trunk. Tagging with nfa-someday.
comment:12 by , 18 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:13 by , 17 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:14 by , 17 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:15 by , 17 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:16 by , 17 years ago
| Cc: | added; removed |
|---|
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | 4667-generic-edit-inline.patch added |
|---|
Cleaned up previous patch to work with existing code base (r7771).
comment:17 by , 17 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:18 by , 17 years ago
The latest patch has the code in django/contrib/admin/options.py which is a wrong place for the code. It should have a nice home in django/contrib/contenttypes. Not sure where but I am thinking either inlines.py or admin.py.
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | 4667-against-7875.patch added |
|---|
comment:19 by , 17 years ago
| Keywords: | ep2008 added |
|---|
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | 4667-against-7875.2.patch added |
|---|
Patch modified - save_as_new argument missing in init
comment:20 by , 17 years ago
Modified constructor (added save_as_new argument), patch 4667-against-7875.2.patch works well on rev. 7877, all tests passed.
Please change your admin options if using example at the top of this page:
class SomeInline( generic.GenericTabularInline ):
model = Dependency
ct_field_name = 'source_ct'
id_field_name = 'target_id'
class SomeModelOptions( admin.ModelAdmin ):
inlines = [ SomeInline ]
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | 4667-against-7875.3.patch added |
|---|
can_delete and can_order update for the patch
comment:21 by , 17 years ago
in my last attachment I just added same default values for can_delete and can_order like there are in django.newforms.models.inlineformset_factory
comment:22 by , 17 years ago
[source:django/branches/newforms-admin/django/newforms/models.py@7899#L450 django.newforms.models.inlineformset_factory]
comment:23 by , 17 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:24 by , 17 years ago
| Version: | newforms-admin → SVN |
|---|
comment:25 by , 17 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:26 by , 17 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:27 by , 17 years ago
| Cc: | removed |
|---|
rough version of the patch