Opened 19 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#3785 closed (fixed)
admin does not valid object id values before using them in database queries
| Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | contrib.admin | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Keywords: | admin, urls, invalid url | |
| Cc: | root.lastnode@…, crucialfelix@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Somehow somewhere, while working with the admin i accidentally appended a +/ to a crud url and this raised the following sql error.
While the admin should not be accessible for anonymous users, it does not feel right to me to have a sql exception raised on a invalid url.
Since django.contrib.admin.urls explicitly specifies the append operations history and delete it would seem that it could very well be aware of the fact that '/admin/article/article/12/+/' is not a valid url.
In django.contrib.admin.views.main change_stage and all others, they clearly define the third path element to be an object_id, so why not use:
('^([^/]+)/([^/]+)/(\d+)/$', 'django.contrib.admin.views.main.change_stage'),
Instead of:
('^([^/]+)/([^/]+)/(.+)/$', 'django.contrib.admin.views.main.change_stage'),
For this and the other url's ? Or at least forbit a another '/' in there.
Url: '/admin/article/article/12/+/'
Traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 77, in get_response
response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/contrib/admin/views/decorators.py", line 55, in _checklogin
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/views/decorators/cache.py", line 39, in _wrapped_view_func
response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/contrib/admin/views/main.py", line 315, in change_stage
manipulator = model.ChangeManipulator(object_id)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/manipulators.py", line 259, in __init__
self.original_object = self.manager.get(pk=obj_key)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", line 73, in get
return self.get_query_set().get(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 250, in get
obj_list = list(clone)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 108, in __iter__
return iter(self._get_data())
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 470, in _get_data
self._result_cache = list(self.iterator())
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 183, in iterator
cursor.execute("SELECT " + (self._distinct and "DISTINCT " or "") + ",".join(select) + sql, params)
ProgrammingError: invalid input syntax for integer: "12/+"
Thanks for Django and all the good work!
Attachments (1)
Change History (10)
by , 19 years ago
| Attachment: | patch.django.contrib.admin.urls.py.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
| Has patch: | unset |
|---|---|
| Summary: | admin allow invalid urls and tries to execute them → admin does not valid object id values before using them in database queries |
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
thanks, your absolutely right.
have not thought of that.
i would like to update the patch to something far more sensible,
but i think i'll better leave that to you guys :)
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
This needs to be re-tested on trunk currently. The urls.py in the admin application no longer exists, but I suspect this is still not working right.
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
Tested it with latest django (r8457) and pinax source.
Exception Type: ValueError at /admin/announcements/announcement/1/@/ Exception Value: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '1/@'
Think we can put this one on post 1.0 ?
Unless brosner (as the authoritive source on NFA ? :) thinks it's an important bug and/or relatively easy and safe patch to get the validation right.
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
I get this coming through all the time.
/admin/nsmailings/maillistings/javascripts/t_tip.js/
no idea what crap browser generates this stuff, I don't even have this javascripts/t_tip.js anywhere on my site.
Its an easy fix, just add ValueError to the caught exceptions :
def get_object(self, request, object_id):
"""
Returns an instance matching the primary key provided. ``None`` is
returned if no match is found (or the object_id failed validation
against the primary key field).
"""
queryset = self.queryset(request)
model = queryset.model
try:
object_id = model._meta.pk.to_python(object_id)
return queryset.get(pk=object_id)
except (model.DoesNotExist, ValidationError,ValueError):
return None
line 387, django/contrib/admin/options.py
comment:7 by , 15 years ago
Second that problem. Mostly seeing it for "content.css" here.
I'm quite sure that for me it's Windows machines with Internet Explorer that cause this.
Would not be in favor of silently ignoring the error but it's definitely irritating. (potentially causing so many emails that the purpose of the error mails get lost inside of all the junk)
But the big 'scary' part seems to be that the sql driver is reporting this.
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 189, in iterator
cursor.execute("SELECT " + (self._distinct and "DISTINCT " or "") + ",".join(select) + sql, params)
DataError: invalid input syntax for integer: "css/content.css"
Now this site does not run the latest Django code, so it might be fixed or get a different exception on trunk ?
comment:8 by , 15 years ago
actually it should throw a 404. then we can handle that in the usual fashion, getting emails or not.
def get_object(self, request, object_id):
"""
Returns an instance matching the primary key provided. ``None`` is
returned if no match is found (or the object_id failed validation
against the primary key field).
"""
queryset = self.queryset(request)
model = queryset.model
try:
object_id = model._meta.pk.to_python(object_id)
return queryset.get(pk=object_id)
except (model.DoesNotExist, ValidationError):
return None
except ValueError:
raise Http404
though I'm not a big fan of catching errors from methods that are polymorphic and could contain ANYTHING. django code makes a lot of assumptions in this fashion, even using it instead of just checking type.
in this case though I think its correct
Not all object ids have to be integers. Custom primary keys can be anything at all, including strings containing slashes and other punctuation. So in some situations "12/+" could be a perfectly valid id.
There is a bug here, though, since, for some reason we are not validating the id value prior to using it in a query. This should cause an error at the form validation stage, not the database query stage of the operation. Changing ticket title to reflect the real problem.
Worth making sure we don't fall into the same trap on the newforms-admin branch.