#35473 closed Bug (fixed)
Typo in historic security advisory
| Reported by: | Darakian | Owned by: | sammy20d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Documentation | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | yes | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Hey all,
Wanted to raise a very minor issue to you all. I work on the advisory database for github and had a user come and suggest an improvement on an old CVE from 2009 (CVE-2009-3965)
See: https://github.com/github/advisory-database/pull/4451
The CVE itself seemed entirely unrelated to me, but then a reference to some django docs was brought up
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security/#october-9-2009-cve-2009-3965
which references the same CVE id.
I ended up doing some digging and I think what happened is that someone typoed on that doc and it should have been 3695 rather than 3965
See: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3695
vs https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3965
Anyway, very minor issue but figured it would be good to report it all the same so that it can get updated :)
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 3 weeks ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 3 weeks ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
|---|---|
| Type: | Uncategorized → Bug |
| Version: | → dev |
comment:3 by , 3 weeks ago
comment:4 by , 3 weeks ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
comment:5 by , 3 weeks ago
| Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
|---|
Hi, this is my first contribution. I have created a PR. Kindly lemme know if I missed anything!