#31546 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Replace Command.requires_system_checks = True by something like Command.required_system_checks = '__all__'
| Reported by: | Hasan Ramezani | Owned by: | Hasan Ramezani | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Core (Management commands) | Version: | dev | 
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no | 
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no | 
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no | 
Description
Created based on Simon comment on the PR
This makes me wonder if we want to replace Command.requires_system_checks = True by something like Command.required_system_checks = '__all__' that can be set to an empty list to achieve required_system_checks = False and allow subclasses that want only a subset to specify tags through it e.g. required_system_checks = ['staticfiles']. That would prevent having do to the manual and error prone options['skip_checks'] dance. In all cases that should be done in a different PR.
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to | 
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned | 
| Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization | 
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted | 
|---|
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 5 years ago
I created a PR for start.
Should we go for deprecating the requires_system_checks = True/False?
comment:4 by , 5 years ago
Replying to Hasan Ramezani:
I created a PR for start.
Should we go for deprecating therequires_system_checks = True/False?
Yes.
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
| Has patch: | set | 
|---|
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
| Patch needs improvement: | set | 
|---|
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
| Patch needs improvement: | unset | 
|---|---|
| Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin | 
OK, accepting based on the discussion on the PR. Thanks!