#3076 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Docs should recommend psycopg2, not recommend against it
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Jacob | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Documentation | Version: | |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | psycopg2 |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
The Django docs currently state that psycopg1 is recommended because 2.0 "is still in beta". Psycopg2 has been stable for a long time, so, the docs are really obsolete. I'm marking this as normal because psycopg2 is *MUCH* better, specially for handling international characters.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
| Keywords: | psychopg2 added |
|---|---|
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
| Keywords: | psycopg2 added; psychopg2 removed |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
| Status: | new → closed |
marking this a dup of #3364 since it has a patch.
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
Always (it's been 5 months) been running on psycopg2 and never had a problem. But then i must say i'm not running anything in production yet. My experience is with WinXP, Python 2.4, Psycopg2 and Django svn.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
There *used to be* a number of issues with psychopg2 not working (e.g. http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/4575a3fe0d78e2e4/7ee0ed2140a947ef?lnk=gst&q=psycopg2&rnum=2#7ee0ed2140a947ef)
Can anyone confirm whether psychopg2 works properly or not?