Opened 8 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#29085 closed Cleanup/optimization (duplicate)
Possible data loss on .save() with unsaved related model.
| Reported by: | Jonas Haag | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
- Create unsaved model C
- Assign unsaved related model P
- Save related model P and C
- Relationship is lost
This is similar to #25160 I guess?
I reproduced this with all versions of Django 1.6 up to master.
from django.db import models
class Parent(models.Model):
pass
class Child(models.Model):
parent = models.ForeignKey(Parent, null=True, blank=True, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
from .models import Parent, Child
from django.test import TestCase
class MyTest(TestCase):
def test_save(self):
child = Child()
child.parent = Parent()
child.parent.save()
# This makes the problem go away:
# child.parent = child.parent
child.save()
child.refresh_from_db()
self.assertIsNotNone(child.parent)
Attachments (1)
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
| Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization |
|---|
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
|---|
by , 8 years ago
| Attachment: | patch.diff added |
|---|
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Without knowing what an implementation might look like, I'd expect the save to work since the parent is saved before the child.
comment:6 by , 7 years ago
I believe I hit the same issue today.
I have a set of related objects that I want to construct all of the forms for, validate all of them, and then save.
However, the reference to the primary object (which is still "connected" to the child instances) is removed when saving.
I _think_ it's got to do with Field.pre_save(self, model_instance, add) being called before saving: which uses field.attname, which is necessarily empty initially (because we don't have a primary key on the reference object, yet).
I'm going to play around, but I think it could be that a ForeignKey can have slightly different behaviour, where it falls back to the related (in-memory) object, if one exists, and field.attname is None.
comment:7 by , 7 years ago
I've been looking into this a bit and I don't see how we can do the right thing here. The problem I see is that the Child model has two sources of truth about the Parent instance and we don't know which we can trust. These sources are Child.parent_id and Child.parent.id. When we save the Parent instance, Child.parent.id changes, but Child.parent_id does not and I don't see a way to push the new pk to Child.parent_id behind the scenes. One can reassign Child.parent explicitly (as noted above), which ensures Child.parent_id is correct.
I looked into adjusting ForeignKey.pre_save to read from Child.parent and Model.save to avoid clearing Child._state.fields_cache, but this either didn't work or broke many other Django tests.
comment:8 by , 6 years ago
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
| Summary: | Possible data loss on .save() with unsaved related model → Possible data loss on .save() with unsaved related model. |
Duplicate of #28147.
Is this the correct approach? Or should we rather consider the behaviour a bug and not use the "prohibited error" in the first place?