The below model breaks in the admin UI:
class Store(models.Model):
2 lastupdate = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)
3 name = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
4 address = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
5 city = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
6 usstate = models.USStateField()
7 zip = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
8 class Admin:
9 pass
10
11
12 class StorePhone(models.Model):
13 lastupdate = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)
14 store = models.ForeignKey(Store,
15 edit_inline=models.TABULAR,
16 num_in_admin = 3)
17 phonenum = models.PhoneNumberField(core=True, db_index=True, unique=True)
18 phonetype = models.IntegerField(core=True, choices = (
19 (1, "DNIs"),
20 (2, "Forwarded 800 #"),
21 ))
Trying to create a new Store results in this error:
File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py" in get_response
27 74. response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
28 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/contrib/admin/views/decorators.py" in _checklogin
29 55. return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
30 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/views/decorators/cache.py" in _wrapped_view_func
31 39. response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
32 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/contrib/admin/views/main.py" in add_stage
33 250. errors = manipulator.get_validation_errors(new_data)
34 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/forms/__init__.py" in get_validation_errors
35 58. errors.update(field.get_validation_errors(new_data))
36 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/forms/__init__.py" in get_validation_errors
37 351. self.run_validator(new_data, validator)
38 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/forms/__init__.py" in run_validator
39 341. validator(new_data.get(self.field_name, ''), new_data)
40 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py" in manipulator_validator_unique
41 35. old_obj = self.manager.get(**{lookup_type: field_data})
42 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/manager.py" in get
43 67. return self.get_query_set().get(*args, **kwargs)
44 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in get
45 211. obj_list = list(clone)
46 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in __iter__
47 103. return iter(self._get_data())
48 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in _get_data
49 430. self._result_cache = list(self.iterator())
50 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in iterator
51 171. select, sql, params = self._get_sql_clause()
52 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in _get_sql_clause
53 444. joins2, where2, params2 = self._filters.get_sql(opts)
54 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in get_sql
55 574. joins2, where2, params2 = val.get_sql(opts)
56 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in get_sql
57 622. return parse_lookup(self.kwargs.items(), opts)
58 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in parse_lookup
59 734. joins2, where2, params2 = lookup_inner(path, lookup_type, value, opts, opts.db_table, None)
60 File "/Library/Python/2.3/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.3.egg/django/db/models/query.py" in lookup_inner
61 835. raise TypeError, "Cannot resolve keyword '%s' into field" % name
62
63 TypeError at /admin/order/store/add/
64 Cannot resolve keyword 'phonenum' into field
If you remove the "unique" part of the phonenum field, it gets much happier.
I can sort of understand. I want it to be illegal for you to assign a phone number to a store if that same number is already assigned to another store. But I can understand that the admin code doesn't get that. And that it is getting confused by the "unique" thing, when it already thinks it has a unique thing.
But it's still a bug. At the very least, I ought to get a more useful error message somewhere.
