#25240 closed New feature (fixed)
Add "week" lookup to DateField/DateTimeField
Reported by: | Chris Foresman | Owned by: | Mads Jensen |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | QuerySet.extra |
Cc: | tarkatronic@…, borfast@…, josh.smeaton@…, code+django@… | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Per the recommendation here, filling a ticket requesting that a "give me all items for the current week" option be added to the ORM to filter DateTime
fields. I'm using the following extra WHERE
clause to achieve this:
where=['EXTRACT(WEEK FROM timestamp) = EXTRACT(WEEK FROM CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)'])
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
Summary: | Current week query for DateTime fields → Add "week" lookup to DateField/DateTimeField |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Type: | Uncategorized → New feature |
Version: | 1.8 → master |
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
I just tried creating such a lookup (by subclassing DateLookup) but I ran into a brick wall in django.db.models.fields. The lookup itself is very simple, emulating precisely how the 'year', 'day', etc lookups are done:
from django.db.models import DateTimeField from django.db.models.lookup import DateLookup @DateTimeField.register_lookup class WeekLookup(DateLookup): lookup_name = 'week' extract_type = 'week'
Simple enough. The problem, however, comes from django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:
def get_prep_lookup(self, lookup_type, value): # For dates lookups, convert the value to an int # so the database backend always sees a consistent type. if lookup_type in ('month', 'day', 'week_day', 'hour', 'minute', 'second'): return int(value) return super(DateField, self).get_prep_lookup(lookup_type, value)
There are two other such special cases in that file. Perhaps I'm just being a bit pedantic, but this seems to violate PEP 20:
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Shy of subclassing DateTimeField, it would seem that there's no way, at present, to use this lookup.
Additionally, as a note on jarshwah's suggestion, you would also have to copy in the implementation of DateTransform, since that isn't present in 1.8 either. A complete implementation of the suggestion looks like:
from django.conf import settings from django.db.models.fields import DateField, DateTimeField, IntegerField, TimeField from django.db.models.functions import Func from django.db.models.lookups import Transform from django.utils import timezone from django.utils.functional import cached_property class Now(Func): template = 'CURRENT_TIMESTAMP' def __init__(self, output_field=None, **extra): if output_field is None: output_field = DateTimeField() super(Now, self).__init__(output_field=output_field, **extra) def as_postgresql(self, compiler, connection): # Postgres' CURRENT_TIMESTAMP means "the time at the start of the # transaction". We use STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP to be cross-compatible with # other databases. self.template = 'STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP()' return self.as_sql(compiler, connection) class DateTransform(Transform): def as_sql(self, compiler, connection): sql, params = compiler.compile(self.lhs) lhs_output_field = self.lhs.output_field if isinstance(lhs_output_field, DateTimeField): tzname = timezone.get_current_timezone_name() if settings.USE_TZ else None sql, tz_params = connection.ops.datetime_extract_sql(self.lookup_name, sql, tzname) params.extend(tz_params) elif isinstance(lhs_output_field, DateField): sql = connection.ops.date_extract_sql(self.lookup_name, sql) elif isinstance(lhs_output_field, TimeField): sql = connection.ops.time_extract_sql(self.lookup_name, sql) else: raise ValueError('DateTransform only valid on Date/Time/DateTimeFields') return sql, params @cached_property def output_field(self): return IntegerField() @DateTimeField.register_lookup class WeekTransform(DateTransform): lookup_name = 'week' bilateral = True
This does work with the suggested usage:
Model.objects.filter(timestamp__week__exact=Now())
However, there is one major limitation. When you do the comparison against a week number, as you would do with the other date part comparisons, you get an AttributeError: 'QueryWrapper' object has no attribute 'output_field'
. And when comparing to a full datetime object, you get TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a number, not 'datetime.datetime'
.
So long story short, the transform approach does work, but does not stay consistent with the existing lookups, and adding a "__week" lookup will require modification of django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:8 by , 8 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
I have no further comments to the PR (https://github.com/django/django/pull/7447), LGTM.
I'm fairly sure that this can be implemented in 1.9 with bilateral transformations. 1.9 is only required because that is when
Now()
was added. If you'd like to copy the implementation ofNow()
into your current codebase, then you could get it to work in 1.8.So there's an argument to be made that
WeekTransform
could be added to core, but without thebilateral
argument in order to remain consistent with the rest of the Date based transforms. I'm currently working on a patch (#24629) that would allow the transform to be used explicitly on the right hand side: