Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#24045 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Useless calls to mark_safe and mark_for_escaping
Reported by: | Aymeric Augustin | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Currently Django contains code similar to:
if isinstance(message, SafeData): return mark_safe(message)
Since mark_safe
is a no-op on SafeData
instances, that's useless!
We should check when that code was introduced, if mark_safe
was always a no-op on SafeData
, and if that reveals a bug or simply useless code.
In the former case we should fix the bug, in the latter remove the code.
There are similar cases with mark_for_escaping
which is a no-op both on SafeData
and EscapeData
instances.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
I looked again and the problem appears to be more narrow than I originally anticipated.
Thanks for doing the research!
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
For 1, the code in question in
trans_null.py
was introduced in 64c0bf86775c5706355c9d3870345b8cff2c63f4. It looks like it could have been removed as part of 2779c299c8b7e4556b5285acc86d17560522e702. PR for that.For 2, outside of the
escape_filter
, the only usage ofmark_for_escaping
seems to be in template/base.py which checksisinstance(obj, EscapeData)
but callsmark_for_escaping(new_obj)
so it doesn't seem redundant.Let me know if I've missed something or should do further auditing.