#21590 closed Cleanup/optimization (invalid)
Don't require forms clean_* methods to return a value
Reported by: | Aymeric Augustin | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Forms | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Adding custom validation to forms isn't as DRY as it colud be:
class MyForm(forms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = MyModel def clean_title(self): title = self.cleaned_data["title"] validate_title(title) # custom validation return title def clean_slug(self): slug = self.cleaned_data["slug"] validate_slug(slug) # custom validation return slug
The requirement that clean()
return a cleaned_data
dict was recently lifted; what about doing the same for clean_*()
? Then the example above could be simplified to:
class MyForm(forms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = MyModel def clean_title(self): validate_title(self.cleaned_data["title"]) # custom validation def clean_slug(self): validate_slug(self.cleaned_data["slug"]) # custom validation
Otherwise developers go for private APIs, eg.:
class MyForm(forms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = MyModel def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): super(MyForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) self.fields["title"].validators.append(validate_title) self.fields["slug"].validators.append(validate_slug)
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
We can't do this, as None
is potentially a valid value for the field. It is conceivable for a field to have a non-None value beforehand, and a clean method to modify it to become None. In the case of clean()
, this is not a problem as None
is not a valid value for self.cleaned_data
.
Maybe it was overlooked to allow
clean_*()
to returnNone
?