#1367 closed defect (fixed)
[magic-removal] Patch to fix unique_together validator
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Adrian Holovaty | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Metasystem | Version: | magic-removal |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
... which still uses the magical get_model_module() stuff.
I'll attach a patch, however it should be noted that:
- The
manipulators.pymodule contains other references to the “old API”, such asget_object(), which I haven't looked into. - I've not added any unit tests, or even run the existing suite, since I couldn't yet figure out how they should be run (why do they need a
DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE? Why can'truntests.pyset that up for me? And why can't I just runsetup.py test, seeing that Django is already using setuptools?)
Attachments (1)
Change History (3)
by , 20 years ago
| Attachment: | unique_together.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 20 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 20 years ago
Thanks for the patch! Regarding your questions about the unit tests -- they require a DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE for the basic connection information (username, password and database driver). I agree that's quite lame, and those should be specified as command-line params instead. Patches are welcome. :)
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Patch for unique_together (against r2314)