#13153 closed (fixed)
An rpm fails to build with python setup.py bdist_rpm
Reported by: | Owned by: | nobody | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Uncategorized | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Keywords: | ||
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Two issues prevent an rpm package to be built with a python setup.py bdist_rpm command. At least this applies to CentOS 5.4, but I don't think it is distro-dependent.
The first one is version number. Here's a crash log:
creating dist tar -cf dist/Django-1.2-beta-1.tar Django-1.2-beta-1 gzip -f9 dist/Django-1.2-beta-1.tar removing 'Django-1.2-beta-1' (and everything under it) copying dist/Django-1.2-beta-1.tar.gz -> build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/SOURCES building RPMs rpmbuild -ba --define _topdir /home/cesar/package/django/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm --clean build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/SPECS/Django.spec error: File /home/cesar/package/django/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/SOURCES/Django-1.2_beta_1.tar.gz: No such file or directory error: command 'rpmbuild' failed with exit status 1
For svn-based builds version is formatted as Django-1.2-beta-1. This version scheme violates RPM rules (see RPM File Naming Convention) as it introduces an extra dash.
Patch version.diff changes version formatting for SVN versions (e.g. Django-1.2_beta_1_svn~12743-1).
The second issue is with source:django/trunk/setup.cfg file. It lists examples directory as containing doc files, while it is missing in the repo. Attached doc_files.diff simply removes it.
Upon applying both of these patches I managed to build and install bleeding edge Django version with yum package manager.
Attachments (2)
Change History (8)
by , 15 years ago
Attachment: | version.diff added |
---|
by , 15 years ago
Attachment: | doc_files.diff added |
---|
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
The first issue is indeed a duplicate of #9616, but the second issue does not appear to be duplicate at all. The doc_files.diff patch still applies - should a new ticket be created, or can we proceed here?
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Ready for checkin |
---|
We can keep this ticket open.
As a side note - this is why we say "one issue per ticket" :-)
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Duplicate of #9616.