Opened 16 years ago

Closed 16 years ago

Last modified 14 years ago

#12837 closed (fixed)

Clarify m2m intermediate table naming strategy

Reported by: Ramiro Morales Owned by: nobody
Component: Documentation Version: dev
Severity: Keywords:
Cc: Triage Stage: Ready for checkin
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

Reports #12614 and #12810 hint about the fact the "By default, this table name is generated using the names of the two tables being joined." phrase at ​http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#id1 is creating confusion among users. We should change that to state the table is named after the model field names.

Attachments (1)

12837.diff​ (1.2 KB ) - added by Ramiro Morales 16 years ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (7)

comment:1 by Alex Gaynor, 16 years ago

Triage Stage: Unreviewed → Accepted

by Ramiro Morales, 16 years ago

Attachment: 12837.diff​ added

comment:2 by Ramiro Morales, 16 years ago

Has patch: set

comment:3 by Tim Graham, 16 years ago

Triage Stage: Accepted → Ready for checkin

comment:4 by Russell Keith-Magee, 16 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: new → closed

(In [12516]) Fixed #12837 -- Clarified the naming strategy for m2m intermediate tables. Thanks to Ramiro Morales for the report and patch.

comment:5 by Russell Keith-Magee, 16 years ago

(In [12521]) [1.1.X] Fixed #12837 -- Clarified the naming strategy for m2m intermediate tables. Thanks to Ramiro Morales for the report and patch.

Backport of r12516 from trunk.

comment:6 by Jacob, 14 years ago

milestone: 1.2

Milestone 1.2 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top