#10367 closed (fixed)
Improve docs for `GenericRelation` in `contenttypes`.
| Reported by: | Tai Lee | Owned by: | Kevin Kubasik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Documentation | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Keywords: | GenericRelation GenericForeignKey comments kkmegapatch | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
At least one contrib app uses a non-default value for fk_field in a GenericForeignKey (comments app uses "object_pk", which means users need to specify their reverse generic relation as GenericRelation(Comment, object_id_field="object_pk"), but keyword arguments for GenericRelation are not documented.
Attachments (2)
Change History (13)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
|---|
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | 10367-genericrelation-r9907.diff added |
|---|
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
| milestone: | → 1.1 beta |
|---|---|
| Version: | 1.0-beta-1 → SVN |
Incorrectly set version as 1.0 beta, instead of milestone 1.1 beta.
comment:5 by , 17 years ago
| Keywords: | kkmegapatch added |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from to |
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | 10367-genericrelation-r10591.diff added |
|---|
Fixed incorrect GenericRelation example.
comment:8 by , 17 years ago
| Resolution: | fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
I think the fix in [10273] actually contained incorrect info about how to use GenericRelation in case of non-default field names.
comment:9 by , 17 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Updated to include an example.