﻿id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	component	version	severity	resolution	keywords	cc	stage	has_patch	needs_docs	needs_tests	needs_better_patch	easy	ui_ux
35976	Document Options.original_attrs	Tim McCurrach		"When a `model.Model` class is created [https://github.com/django/django/blob/ded485464214a3f69b64402b7d82221279f80008/django/db/models/base.py#L112 the metaclass `pop`s off] any `Meta` attribue defined on the model [https://github.com/django/django/blob/ded485464214a3f69b64402b7d82221279f80008/django/db/models/base.py#L122 before calling] `super.__new__()`. We do [https://github.com/django/django/blob/ded485464214a3f69b64402b7d82221279f80008/django/db/models/base.py#L145 pass it as an argument] to the `Options` class, and [https://github.com/django/django/blob/ded485464214a3f69b64402b7d82221279f80008/django/db/models/options.py#L136 it's stored] on the `Options` instance, however [https://github.com/django/django/blob/ded485464214a3f69b64402b7d82221279f80008/django/db/models/options.py#L232 this is then deleted] whilst the `Options.contribute_to_class` class is called. The attributes from the meta value are stored on a `original_attrs` attribute however. It might be a good idea to document that this attribute exists.

=== Motivation for the documentation ===

The motivation for this came change is born out of a desire to write a check that `db_table` is explicitly defined on all my models (even if it matches the default value that django would apply). I can write checks that require things like `ordering` is defined (or not defined) on a model. The problem with `db_table` is that defaults are applied when `contribute_to_class` is called. This means we need a reference to the underlying original Meta data. The `original_attrs` attribute is perfect for this, but as far as I can tell it isn't documented anywhere."	Uncategorized	new	Documentation	5.1	Normal			Tim McCurrach Simon Charette	Unreviewed	0	0	0	0	1	0
