﻿id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	component	version	severity	resolution	keywords	cc	stage	has_patch	needs_docs	needs_tests	needs_better_patch	easy	ui_ux
29398	Clarify that cascade deletion doesn't invoke .delete() on the cascaded objects	Daniel Quinn	Jacob Tomlinson	"I understand that when using `.delete()` on a queryset, the object(s) in question won't have their `.delete()` method executed.  However, if you're explicitly calling `.delete()` on an object, I would expect that this would in turn call `.delete()` on any cascaded objects as well, and this appears not to be the case.  Some example code for illustration:

{{{
class User(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=16)

    def delete(self, *args, **kwargs):
        print(""This is executed"")
        super().delete(*args, **kwargs)


class Business(models.Model):
    user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)

    def delete(self, *args, **kwargs):
        print(""This isn't executed :-("")
        super().delete(*args, **kwargs)

# This will run User.delete() and delete the associated business, but *not* execute Business.delete()
User.objects.first().delete()
}}}

It's unclear whether this is a bug or intentional, but I didn't see anything about this in the documentation and it surprised me today, so I thought I would mention it.  I generally don't like signals (too much magic) but is that the preferred method for handling deletion special cases?"	Cleanup/optimization	closed	Documentation	1.11	Normal	fixed	delete cascade		Accepted	0	0	0	0	0	0
