﻿id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	component	version	severity	resolution	keywords	cc	stage	has_patch	needs_docs	needs_tests	needs_better_patch	easy	ui_ux
23624	Regression in ManyToManyField with through, runtime-generated models	Ludovico Magnocavallo	nobody	"I admit my situation is a corner case: an app interfacing with a legacy db, where I need to extend an abstract model to contextualize it to identical tables, named differently (eg obj_1 table, obj_2 table, etc.), and to make things worse the number of tables is only known at runtime.

I am then dynamically generating a module for each set of models, and while things work great in Django 1.6, in 1.7 ManyToManyField using a through model breaks.

I am attaching a sample models.py file that illustrates the issue. I have not yet found the time to delve into what's happening, I hope someone with a better understanding of all the related stuff steps in as it's something I have never looked into.

What happens is that the manager seems to ignore the through model, here is the traceback (actual call and models in the attached file):


{{{
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ""<console>"", line 1, in <module>
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py"", line 191, in all
    return self.get_queryset()
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py"", line 887, in get_queryset
    return qs._next_is_sticky().filter(**self.core_filters)
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py"", line 691, in filter
    return self._filter_or_exclude(False, *args, **kwargs)
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py"", line 709, in _filter_or_exclude
    clone.query.add_q(Q(*args, **kwargs))
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/query.py"", line 1287, in add_q
    clause, require_inner = self._add_q(where_part, self.used_aliases)
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/query.py"", line 1314, in _add_q
    current_negated=current_negated, connector=connector)
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/query.py"", line 1138, in build_filter
    lookups, parts, reffed_aggregate = self.solve_lookup_type(arg)
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/query.py"", line 1076, in solve_lookup_type
    _, field, _, lookup_parts = self.names_to_path(lookup_splitted, self.get_meta())
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/query.py"", line 1383, in names_to_path
    self.raise_field_error(opts, name)
  File ""/home/ludo/Desktop/dev/venv/spritz/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/query.py"", line 1389, in raise_field_error
    ""Choices are: %s"" % (name, "", "".join(available)))
FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword u'a' into field. Choices are: a_s, id, name

}}}



"	Bug	new	Database layer (models, ORM)	1.7	Normal				Unreviewed	0	0	0	0	0	0
