﻿id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	component	version	severity	resolution	keywords	cc	stage	has_patch	needs_docs	needs_tests	needs_better_patch	easy	ui_ux
9628	Using pysqlite2 instead of sqlite3 when needed	mdh	jbronn	"Loading SQLite extensions (such as SpatiaLite, which happens to be my use case) requires `pysqlite` 2.5.0, which is newer than the version that now ships as the `sqlite3` module with Python.  Currently Django always uses `sqlite3` if it is present, even if the user has installed a newer version of `pysqlite2`.

The original reason for making `sqlite3` the default was to “to do the right thing first and fallback” (#2772), which made the (seemingly reasonable) assumption that `sqlite3` would become the undisputed correct name in the future.  Unfortunately the package itself retained the `pysqlite2` name, and only the Python-internal snapshots (which will inevitably become outdated) have the `sqlite3` name.

So the question is, how can users take advantage of newer versions of `pysqlite2`, without having to go mucking around in their Python installation to disable the older `sqlite3` module (or something equally unpleasant).

Options include:

A. Leave `sqlite3` as the default, and add a configuration setting that forces use of `pysqlite2` if desired.

B. Always try both `sqlite3` and `pysqlite2`, and use whichever has the greater version number if both are present.

C. Same as B, but with an optional configuration option to force one or the other if desired.

D. Switch to making `pysqlite2` the default, since that’s the correct name for the module if the user has explicitly installed it, and treat the Python-bundled version as the fallback.

E. Develop arbitrarily convoluted bits of logic that pay attention to e.g. what Python version we're running under or the phase of the moon or something.

Several of these seem like reasonable options.  For the moment I have created a simple patch that implements option B.  I'm curious what others think about this.

It's not at all obvious to me how to write tests for a patch like this, since shouldn’t change the behavior in any way unless you happen to have a new version of `pysqlite2` installed on your system.  So, for the moment I have no tests.  I would love some advice on what, if any, tests I could add."		closed	Database layer (models, ORM)	1.0		fixed			Accepted	1	1	0	0	0	0
