| 6 | | I am not able to figure out how adjusting `check_dependency`, could help |
| 7 | | solve this issue. Assuming that I loop through all fields present in the |
| 8 | | base model, check if they're present in the inherited model, and if there |
| 9 | | are any such fields present, append `base_app_label, base_name, |
| 10 | | field_name, False` to `dependencies`, how would adjusting |
| 11 | | `check_dependency` able to reorder the migrations? |
| | 6 | I am not able to figure out how adjusting `check_dependency`, could help solve this issue. Assuming that I loop through all fields present in the base model, check if they're present in the inherited model, and if there are any such fields present, append `base_app_label, base_name, field_name, False` to `dependencies`, how would adjusting `check_dependency` able to reorder the migrations? |