Opened 12 years ago
Last modified 11 months ago
#21286 assigned Bug
Fix commented out tests in serializers.test_data
| Reported by: | Tim Graham | Owned by: | Adam Zapletal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Core (Serialization) | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | bmispelon@…, Adam Zapletal, Ülgen Sarıkavak | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
tests/serializers/test_data.py contains some commented out items in the test_data list. I think it may be because not all serializers support those items. If this is the case, we should make appropriate modifications so the tests are run where they are supported and skipped where not.
Change History (29)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Summary: | Fix commented out tests in serializers_regress → Fix commented out tests in serializers.test_data |
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
@claude Your latest commit caused quite a few failures, did you forget to commit some code?
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
Argh, sorry! I was fooled by the fact the missing YAML lib in my test virtualenv wasn't showing by a skipped ('s') test. I will revert ASAP and try to work on that skip issue.
comment:10 by , 20 months ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:11 by , 20 months ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
I started looking at this ticket today to see if it was still valid and submitted a small PR removing what I believe are some invalid, commented-out test cases.
comment:13 by , 20 months ago
| Has patch: | unset |
|---|
comment:14 by , 19 months ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:15 by , 12 months ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:16 by , 12 months ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
I opened a PR uncommenting and adding a fix for TimePKData.
comment:18 by , 12 months ago
| Has patch: | unset |
|---|
comment:19 by , 12 months ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
I opened a PR uncommenting and adding a fix for TextPKData.
comment:20 by , 11 months ago
| Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
|---|
comment:22 by , 11 months ago
| Has patch: | unset |
|---|
comment:23 by , 11 months ago
| Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Accepted |
|---|
comment:24 by , 11 months ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
I opened a PR enabling the ImageField data tests in the same way that FileField is currently tested.
comment:25 by , 11 months ago
| Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
|---|
comment:27 by , 11 months ago
| Has patch: | unset |
|---|---|
| Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Accepted |
comment:28 by , 11 months ago
The final commented-out tests are blocked by #10244. I'll shift my focus to that ticket.
While looking into this, I believe I found the reason why some of the tests are commented: https://github.com/django/django/blob/8d6953d55c3aba04bbaf0f268499d6e405c653ff/tests/serializers_regress/models.py#L168-L170
The comment is not completely correct however because a few of the commented out models trigger and error immediately, regardless of the backend (
TypeError: 'primary_key' is not a valid argument for ...).FilePKData,ImagePKDataandNullBooleanPKDatacan be deleted because of this.DatePKData,DateTimePKData,TimePKDataandTextPKDatamight be database-dependent (they all work under sqlite).FileData) might be worth looking into a bit deeper. It fails when uncommented and I believe it might be caused by the weirdFileField.__eq__implementation.